Senator McCain:
I received your presidential campaign letter today along with the enclosed STAND UP FOR AMERICA SURVEY so I immediately made the decision to answer right now.
Really I am not sure, but it is my understanding if there is not a check in the envelope a true politician feels there is “no” real future in reading the in-coming mail.
There is “no” check…..
You have several problems why American taxpaying citizens can’t vote for you, and I must admit this family is having a hard time making that decision. The conflict is not Democrat and Republican, it is to sponsor you are not even vote at all? Still “no” check?
The letter, the survey, made no mention of any illegal aliens or immigration concerns. In some areas it is the number one issue in the United States today. Speaking of today, the decision was finally made to not ”sneak” amnesty for farm workers, sheep herders, goat herders, etc., in the Iraq Supplemental Funding Bill. I found it appalling that the Senate Appropriations Committee would allow Feinstein and Craig to try and hijack the Iraq Bill with a amnesty proposal. This was insulting to American servicemen and servicewomen.
The facts are this, “What is the problem in Washington, D.C., what part of ‘illegal’ don’t the so-called leaders understand?” Is it fear of war with Mexico? Why is it not one of you presidential candidates are willing to discuss the huge economic impact that immigration, especially illegal immigration has on our nation. The immigration crisis that confronts our nation today significantly impacts many other aspects of the United States.
At the top of the list are national security, criminal justice, the economy, health care and education. Mr. Edwin Rubinstein’s report notes that 15 federal agencies are significantly impacted by immigration and stated that the overall cost to the federal government last year was 346 billion dollars!
Stop the rhetoric, American taxpaying citizens don’t want illegal aliens, unlimited uneducated, unskilled cheap labor, temporary or guest worker amnesty, desease, 50-million more anchor babies, welfare, food stamps. Stop all immigration for a year, give this country some time off, let America breath some fresh air and back on our feet.
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
Blog site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
HATRED - America is really loved.....
I received the following e-mail two years ago, paid little attention to it, but now with our fascist government working 24/7, especially after midnight, to destroy this once great country, which of the following are not true?
With three socialist presidential candidates lining up for the top U.S. office what part of the following remarks will hold true in our future?
The Pew Hispanic Research Center just reported the U.S. population will increase by 142 million by the year 2050, which I don’t think the year model is true. In my opinion, it will be much sooner. What about SPP in yr. 2010?
Some of the following foreign brain trust say, “in the 20 years, Latino’s will be in control…..” Pew did say, ‘only 50 million will be anchor babies,‘ but I don’t think that is a problem, they will be taken care of, compliments of the American taxpayers. (America loves to give: "freebee's")
I would really appreciate your response, thank you…..
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
HATRED! (They “White Americans” are shitting in their pants with fear)
May 1, 2006
Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired.
Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people.
It is your duty to die Through love of having children, we are going to take over.
Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions.
They're right. We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."
Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."
Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it."
Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."
Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state.
Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General , "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."
Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "
Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes. Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders.
THE U.S. VS MEXICO: On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country.
They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege.
The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent. Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated.
Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.
Unhappy American
Blog site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
With three socialist presidential candidates lining up for the top U.S. office what part of the following remarks will hold true in our future?
The Pew Hispanic Research Center just reported the U.S. population will increase by 142 million by the year 2050, which I don’t think the year model is true. In my opinion, it will be much sooner. What about SPP in yr. 2010?
Some of the following foreign brain trust say, “in the 20 years, Latino’s will be in control…..” Pew did say, ‘only 50 million will be anchor babies,‘ but I don’t think that is a problem, they will be taken care of, compliments of the American taxpayers. (America loves to give: "freebee's")
I would really appreciate your response, thank you…..
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
HATRED! (They “White Americans” are shitting in their pants with fear)
May 1, 2006
Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired.
Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people.
It is your duty to die Through love of having children, we are going to take over.
Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions.
They're right. We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."
Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."
Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it."
Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."
Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state.
Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General , "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."
Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "
Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes. Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders.
THE U.S. VS MEXICO: On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country.
They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege.
The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent. Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated.
Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.
Unhappy American
Blog site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Friday, May 16, 2008
A Citizens View by Robert B. Murray
Do you smell that foul odor emanating from the halls of government? Everyone knows our government was formed by the people, specifically for the people, and is governed by the rule of law. So surely it cannot be from the “sweetheart deals” made between our leaders and their corporate sponsors, but there it is right under everyone’s noses. Our leaders have transformed the words “for the people” into “for the corporations.” We the people are no longer relevant.
At all levels of government ties to corporations have become so pervasive the people have little or no say in anything that counters corporate interests. Rather than protecting the people’s interest, government has become the willing partner to further corporate ends. The sole purpose of government, at all levels, seems to exist only to support business and their quest for greater profit. We see this by the constant push by government to grow our nation both in terms of more people whether legally or illegally, and the economy. There is little concern about the cost of growth as long as government and corporations share the wealth at the expense of the people.
Whole state departments are devoted to encouraging growth of their respective states. Nearly every facet of business has a number of large groups devoted to insuring they are well cared for by Congress. Collectively, the voices of business drown out the cries of the people for tax relief because government conveniently assumes we are responsible for growth so we should pay for it. Government also assumes that business needs tax breaks, grants, low cost insurance, direct loans, trade protection, unjustified special interest loopholes in the tax code, and other incentives or economic growth will cease. And, also, their own selfish interests would wither.
Our founding fathers created a system of free enterprise in which government was to stay out of the way of business. Unfortunately, government had, without the people’s consent, devised a fascist system (“the corporate state”) patterned after that of Benito Mussolini. The corporate welfare system is mutually beneficial for both government and business. The former gains power, while the latter gains greater wealth and also power to impose their will on the people.
No matter how you look at it, we the people are being scammed, fleeced, by our government to the tune of billions of dollars in corporate subsidies. Why should we be subsidizing ethanol production when it takes more energy to produce ethanol than we gain? Should we the people subsidize global corporations by contributing our tax monies to the Export-Import Bank, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the International Monetary Fund, or in fact any subsidies? It’s beyond comprehension why we the people must endure $4.00 gasoline while corporate oil companies enjoy billions in profit, while receiving subsidies.
When will government realize that our Constitution is our supreme law and act accordingly? The preamble says, “We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America..”
The chaos created by those of greed and power are destroying our Constitution.. It is time for the citizens to awake to the realities of what is happening by special interests, the desire for socializing the country, destruction and ignoring of our laws, and for each one of us to understand the consequences of our inactions to stop this assault on our sovereignty. Let’s rid the stench, now!
Unhappy American
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
At all levels of government ties to corporations have become so pervasive the people have little or no say in anything that counters corporate interests. Rather than protecting the people’s interest, government has become the willing partner to further corporate ends. The sole purpose of government, at all levels, seems to exist only to support business and their quest for greater profit. We see this by the constant push by government to grow our nation both in terms of more people whether legally or illegally, and the economy. There is little concern about the cost of growth as long as government and corporations share the wealth at the expense of the people.
Whole state departments are devoted to encouraging growth of their respective states. Nearly every facet of business has a number of large groups devoted to insuring they are well cared for by Congress. Collectively, the voices of business drown out the cries of the people for tax relief because government conveniently assumes we are responsible for growth so we should pay for it. Government also assumes that business needs tax breaks, grants, low cost insurance, direct loans, trade protection, unjustified special interest loopholes in the tax code, and other incentives or economic growth will cease. And, also, their own selfish interests would wither.
Our founding fathers created a system of free enterprise in which government was to stay out of the way of business. Unfortunately, government had, without the people’s consent, devised a fascist system (“the corporate state”) patterned after that of Benito Mussolini. The corporate welfare system is mutually beneficial for both government and business. The former gains power, while the latter gains greater wealth and also power to impose their will on the people.
No matter how you look at it, we the people are being scammed, fleeced, by our government to the tune of billions of dollars in corporate subsidies. Why should we be subsidizing ethanol production when it takes more energy to produce ethanol than we gain? Should we the people subsidize global corporations by contributing our tax monies to the Export-Import Bank, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the International Monetary Fund, or in fact any subsidies? It’s beyond comprehension why we the people must endure $4.00 gasoline while corporate oil companies enjoy billions in profit, while receiving subsidies.
When will government realize that our Constitution is our supreme law and act accordingly? The preamble says, “We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America..”
The chaos created by those of greed and power are destroying our Constitution.. It is time for the citizens to awake to the realities of what is happening by special interests, the desire for socializing the country, destruction and ignoring of our laws, and for each one of us to understand the consequences of our inactions to stop this assault on our sovereignty. Let’s rid the stench, now!
Unhappy American
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Monday, May 12, 2008
Opinion - New York Times - What Social Security Isn’t Meant to Do
Today The New York Times posted an "Opinion" article on how "disgusted" they are about the "SAVE Act" and what harm it will do to the immigration problem. The Times is so pro-illegal-alien it can't understand why aliens can't have everything plus, by all means, should not have to be a citizen of the United States to work? This comment was made.....
"the Social Security database is rotten with errors"
If the SS database is rotten with errors, what does THAT mean for the increased use as baby boomers retire? There is no better way to clean up a database than rigorous use, correcting errors as they are found. If you are a person about to apply for SS in a few years, when would you like to find an error in your SS records, now or after you've made plans to retire, quit your job, and will depend on SS to help you live?
All of this is simply the Main Stream Media's feeble attempt to justify amnesty. Grant illegal aliens amnesty (aka a path to citizenship, a way out of the shadows, etc) and the problem is "solved"; and the Social Security file, "rotten with errors", never gets fixed.The SAVE Act allows a time period for a mismatch to be corrected; and in most states a person can be fired, period. The employer doesn't NEED an excuse. "I no longer need your services" will do.
This was pointed out REPEATEDLY in the last NYT editorial on this subject in the comments section.What you aren't hearing is that these errors could have been well on their way to being fixed if SS and the IRS had coordinated carefully together and had informed people when their SS # was likely being used unlawfully. Most people find out about this only when they receive a bill from the IRS for taxes on money earned by somebody - or more than one somebody - using their SS # unlawfully.There are errors in the IRS database and in the SS database - I've had to get my own record corrected - and IF you are on the level, it usually doesn't take long to correct them.
Is the NYT suggesting that we stop collecting taxes and paying SS benefits until these files are 100% perfect? Of course not.
This is a non-issue. Pass the SAVE Act and let's get the job of verifying legality done. And let's let our legislators know that we want this to happen NOW. And let's also remember in November if they fail to do so.
Unhappy American
Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
"the Social Security database is rotten with errors"
If the SS database is rotten with errors, what does THAT mean for the increased use as baby boomers retire? There is no better way to clean up a database than rigorous use, correcting errors as they are found. If you are a person about to apply for SS in a few years, when would you like to find an error in your SS records, now or after you've made plans to retire, quit your job, and will depend on SS to help you live?
All of this is simply the Main Stream Media's feeble attempt to justify amnesty. Grant illegal aliens amnesty (aka a path to citizenship, a way out of the shadows, etc) and the problem is "solved"; and the Social Security file, "rotten with errors", never gets fixed.The SAVE Act allows a time period for a mismatch to be corrected; and in most states a person can be fired, period. The employer doesn't NEED an excuse. "I no longer need your services" will do.
This was pointed out REPEATEDLY in the last NYT editorial on this subject in the comments section.What you aren't hearing is that these errors could have been well on their way to being fixed if SS and the IRS had coordinated carefully together and had informed people when their SS # was likely being used unlawfully. Most people find out about this only when they receive a bill from the IRS for taxes on money earned by somebody - or more than one somebody - using their SS # unlawfully.There are errors in the IRS database and in the SS database - I've had to get my own record corrected - and IF you are on the level, it usually doesn't take long to correct them.
Is the NYT suggesting that we stop collecting taxes and paying SS benefits until these files are 100% perfect? Of course not.
This is a non-issue. Pass the SAVE Act and let's get the job of verifying legality done. And let's let our legislators know that we want this to happen NOW. And let's also remember in November if they fail to do so.
Unhappy American
Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Friday, May 09, 2008
NEW IDAHO TO GET LAUGHABLE "MATRICULAR CONSULAR I.D. CARD
CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES
"IDs for Illegals The 'Matricula Consular'Advances Mexico's Immigration Agenda"
January 2003
By Marti Dinerstein
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a migration deal with Mexico was tabled while attention turned to homeland security. So the Mexican government abruptly changed its White House strategy and substituted a grass-roots approach that would focus at the local level, seek small successes, and build momentum for congressional action. The linchpin for this new strategy was to be the “matricula consular,” an official identity card issued by the Mexican government, which it wanted to be officially recognized within the United States.
This Backgrounder is the first detailed examination of the matricula issue. Among the findings:
* The matricula consular is useful in the United States only for illegal aliens, since legal immigrants, by definition, have U.S. government-issued documents.
* The Mexican government has launched an aggressive grassroots lobbying campaign to win acceptance for its matricula card from state and local jurisdictions and from banks, especially in areas where Mexican illegal aliens are concentrated.
* The objective of this lobbying effort is to achieve quasi-legal status for Mexican illegals in the United States without waiting for action from Washington.
* The matricula itself, however, is useful to illegal aliens only insofar as U.S. institutions are willing to collaborate with Mexico’s efforts to circumvent U.S. immigration law.
* While many jurisdictions have resisted pressure from the Mexican government, others have not; the matricula is now accepted by 800 local law enforcement agencies and 74 banks, as well as by 13 states for purposes of obtaining a driver’s license.
* Not only does the matricula subvert U.S. immigration law, it is not even a secure identity document. Mexico is not authenticating the documents used to obtain the matricula against computerized data files in Mexico.
* Safeguards are not in place to prevent multiple issuance of matriculas to the same individual; in fact, the INS has already reported finding multiple cards in different names issued to the same person.
* The matricula is becoming a shield that hides criminal activity for two reasons: first, the holder’s identity was not verified when the card was issued, and second, police in jurisdictions that accept the matricula are less likely to run background checks on card holders picked up for minor infractions.
* The U.S. Treasury Department has given its approval to banks to accept the matricula for opening bank accounts.
* The acceptance of Mexico’s matricula consular sets a precedent, making it almost impossible to reject similar cards presented by illegal aliens from other countries, including those which have sent terrorists to the United States in the past.
Early in September 2001, the Mexican government had every expectation that it would soon achieve its principal foreign policy goal — a comprehensive migration agreement with the United States that would create new guest worker programs, exempt Mexico from visa limits, and “regularize” the immigration status of the estimated three to five million Mexicans already living in the United States illegally.
After 9/11, public and congressional opposition in the United States to an illegal-alien amnesty hardened and made such a deal impossible. In its place, Mexico sought piecemeal changes, centered on gaining acceptance in the United States for the “matricula consular.” But Mexico’s new approach has become a direct challenge to U.S. sovereignty — by aggressively lobbying state and local governments, Mexico is changing America’s de facto immigration policy in lieu of congressional action. And it has been doing so while the U.S. government watched — or even gave its tacit consent.
December 18, 2005, The Idaho Press-Tribune reporter Ben Fletcher wrote: "If the Undocumented stayed out of Jail they will not be deported," he went on to say that Canyon County, Idaho is a safe haven for illegal immigrants......
I guess maybe now, you could say, Idaho might be a sanctuary for illegal aliens? Maybe?
Unhappy American
"IDs for Illegals The 'Matricula Consular'Advances Mexico's Immigration Agenda"
January 2003
By Marti Dinerstein
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a migration deal with Mexico was tabled while attention turned to homeland security. So the Mexican government abruptly changed its White House strategy and substituted a grass-roots approach that would focus at the local level, seek small successes, and build momentum for congressional action. The linchpin for this new strategy was to be the “matricula consular,” an official identity card issued by the Mexican government, which it wanted to be officially recognized within the United States.
This Backgrounder is the first detailed examination of the matricula issue. Among the findings:
* The matricula consular is useful in the United States only for illegal aliens, since legal immigrants, by definition, have U.S. government-issued documents.
* The Mexican government has launched an aggressive grassroots lobbying campaign to win acceptance for its matricula card from state and local jurisdictions and from banks, especially in areas where Mexican illegal aliens are concentrated.
* The objective of this lobbying effort is to achieve quasi-legal status for Mexican illegals in the United States without waiting for action from Washington.
* The matricula itself, however, is useful to illegal aliens only insofar as U.S. institutions are willing to collaborate with Mexico’s efforts to circumvent U.S. immigration law.
* While many jurisdictions have resisted pressure from the Mexican government, others have not; the matricula is now accepted by 800 local law enforcement agencies and 74 banks, as well as by 13 states for purposes of obtaining a driver’s license.
* Not only does the matricula subvert U.S. immigration law, it is not even a secure identity document. Mexico is not authenticating the documents used to obtain the matricula against computerized data files in Mexico.
* Safeguards are not in place to prevent multiple issuance of matriculas to the same individual; in fact, the INS has already reported finding multiple cards in different names issued to the same person.
* The matricula is becoming a shield that hides criminal activity for two reasons: first, the holder’s identity was not verified when the card was issued, and second, police in jurisdictions that accept the matricula are less likely to run background checks on card holders picked up for minor infractions.
* The U.S. Treasury Department has given its approval to banks to accept the matricula for opening bank accounts.
* The acceptance of Mexico’s matricula consular sets a precedent, making it almost impossible to reject similar cards presented by illegal aliens from other countries, including those which have sent terrorists to the United States in the past.
Early in September 2001, the Mexican government had every expectation that it would soon achieve its principal foreign policy goal — a comprehensive migration agreement with the United States that would create new guest worker programs, exempt Mexico from visa limits, and “regularize” the immigration status of the estimated three to five million Mexicans already living in the United States illegally.
After 9/11, public and congressional opposition in the United States to an illegal-alien amnesty hardened and made such a deal impossible. In its place, Mexico sought piecemeal changes, centered on gaining acceptance in the United States for the “matricula consular.” But Mexico’s new approach has become a direct challenge to U.S. sovereignty — by aggressively lobbying state and local governments, Mexico is changing America’s de facto immigration policy in lieu of congressional action. And it has been doing so while the U.S. government watched — or even gave its tacit consent.
December 18, 2005, The Idaho Press-Tribune reporter Ben Fletcher wrote: "If the Undocumented stayed out of Jail they will not be deported," he went on to say that Canyon County, Idaho is a safe haven for illegal immigrants......
I guess maybe now, you could say, Idaho might be a sanctuary for illegal aliens? Maybe?
Unhappy American
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
YES TO S.2717 - ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS
The Honorable Larry E. Craig
United States Senate
520 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-1203
Re: America needs the local assistance facilitated by S 2717 to enforce our immigration laws.
To: Senator Craig:
We must secure our border, but we also need the interior enforcement that can only be provided by local law enforcement agencies.
State and local law enforcement officers are on the front lines of combating crimes committed by illegal immigrants, but they are often hampered in their efforts or unclear as to their authority.
S 2717 would clarify the authority of state and local law enforcement agencies to identify and apprehend illegal aliens to enforce federal immigration laws.
In addition, the bill requires DHS to offer training for state and local law enforcement officers and to compensate local entities for immigration enforcement expenses.
Every day, our state and local communities face the repercussions of a national immigration problem. This bill gives state and local law enforcement the means to work as partners with federal immigration officials.
December 18, 2008, The Idaho Press-Tribune indicated that Canyon County as a safe haven for illegal aliens. Most Treasure Valley Police Chiefs do-not feel it to be necessary to arrest and detain illegal aliens, which makes many citizens uncomfortable that law enforcement has no concern about invaders who have broken immigration laws, creating Idaho as a sanctuary for illegal aliens. We want protection.....
The federal government has ignored this problem too long. I encourage you to help local governments and all Americans by co-sponsoring S 2717.
Sincerely,
Unhappy American
Blog Sites: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
United States Senate
520 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-1203
Re: America needs the local assistance facilitated by S 2717 to enforce our immigration laws.
To: Senator Craig:
We must secure our border, but we also need the interior enforcement that can only be provided by local law enforcement agencies.
State and local law enforcement officers are on the front lines of combating crimes committed by illegal immigrants, but they are often hampered in their efforts or unclear as to their authority.
S 2717 would clarify the authority of state and local law enforcement agencies to identify and apprehend illegal aliens to enforce federal immigration laws.
In addition, the bill requires DHS to offer training for state and local law enforcement officers and to compensate local entities for immigration enforcement expenses.
Every day, our state and local communities face the repercussions of a national immigration problem. This bill gives state and local law enforcement the means to work as partners with federal immigration officials.
December 18, 2008, The Idaho Press-Tribune indicated that Canyon County as a safe haven for illegal aliens. Most Treasure Valley Police Chiefs do-not feel it to be necessary to arrest and detain illegal aliens, which makes many citizens uncomfortable that law enforcement has no concern about invaders who have broken immigration laws, creating Idaho as a sanctuary for illegal aliens. We want protection.....
The federal government has ignored this problem too long. I encourage you to help local governments and all Americans by co-sponsoring S 2717.
Sincerely,
Unhappy American
Blog Sites: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio for President
Sheriff Joe is a model of what efficiency and effectiveness in law enforcement is. He has an 80% or so approval rating. His 20% disapproval probably comes from illegal immigrants themselves. Considering 1/4 to 1/3 of prison inmates are composed of illegal immigrants, he is actually doing something significant to stop crime before it occurs by deporting these criminals. We need more men like him in charge.
The federal mandate is to stop illegal immigration, right? That is what "Sheriff Joe" is doing: All within legal ways. He seems to be better organized to do the job than the vast majority of sheriffs around the country, is that wrong?
He sees that his action gets publicity in order to warn the criminals that Maricopa County is not a safe place for them. Where did you get the fact that "Sheriff Joe" has ignored all those "thousand of criminal warrant"?
Although we are the fifth largest city in the country, we enjoy being one of the safest to live. We like that, that's the reason we keep electing him. Most convicted criminals today have a higher standard of living in prison than they had on the outside. Most prisons are like the Waldorf to people like you and I compared to where they lived. For a change they have clean, safe, air conditioned places to live with three well prepared meals a day, they're medical needs are provided, they can shower everyday and get clean clothes everyday. they can play games, use exercise equipment. For most, prison is almost like a resort by what their accustomed to. They just can't some and go even if they wanted to.
Sheriff Joe's prison is a bunch of un-air conditioned tents where prisoners sleep on double- deck cots, they're fed plain sandwiches, They're issued pink underwear to keep the prisoners from giving them to visitors to take home for them. All this is done to discourage their desire to come back once they are released. Now that's punishment for crime.
I've heard some people from both here and Texas state they would like to see "Sheriff Joe" run for president. Seeing first hand the improvement in crime prevention and his operation and results: And after watching and listening to the present bunch running for that office I'm tempted to join them.I guess you'd have to live here to understand the situation. Before Sheriff Joe we had a "byc" repairman for a sheriff (true statement).
When I moved here in 1974 majority of the population was white, now the majority is Mexican.
For those of you who don't know, Scottsdale is a suburb of Phoenix in Maricopa County, Arizona. Thanks for letting me put things a little straighter. — Tom Downs, Scottsdale, AZ
Unhappy American
Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
The federal mandate is to stop illegal immigration, right? That is what "Sheriff Joe" is doing: All within legal ways. He seems to be better organized to do the job than the vast majority of sheriffs around the country, is that wrong?
He sees that his action gets publicity in order to warn the criminals that Maricopa County is not a safe place for them. Where did you get the fact that "Sheriff Joe" has ignored all those "thousand of criminal warrant"?
Although we are the fifth largest city in the country, we enjoy being one of the safest to live. We like that, that's the reason we keep electing him. Most convicted criminals today have a higher standard of living in prison than they had on the outside. Most prisons are like the Waldorf to people like you and I compared to where they lived. For a change they have clean, safe, air conditioned places to live with three well prepared meals a day, they're medical needs are provided, they can shower everyday and get clean clothes everyday. they can play games, use exercise equipment. For most, prison is almost like a resort by what their accustomed to. They just can't some and go even if they wanted to.
Sheriff Joe's prison is a bunch of un-air conditioned tents where prisoners sleep on double- deck cots, they're fed plain sandwiches, They're issued pink underwear to keep the prisoners from giving them to visitors to take home for them. All this is done to discourage their desire to come back once they are released. Now that's punishment for crime.
I've heard some people from both here and Texas state they would like to see "Sheriff Joe" run for president. Seeing first hand the improvement in crime prevention and his operation and results: And after watching and listening to the present bunch running for that office I'm tempted to join them.I guess you'd have to live here to understand the situation. Before Sheriff Joe we had a "byc" repairman for a sheriff (true statement).
When I moved here in 1974 majority of the population was white, now the majority is Mexican.
For those of you who don't know, Scottsdale is a suburb of Phoenix in Maricopa County, Arizona. Thanks for letting me put things a little straighter. — Tom Downs, Scottsdale, AZ
Unhappy American
Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, April 12, 2008
FIGHTING FOR AMERICA
The pro-illegal immigrant special interests groups use the same MANTRA, as though by confusing the words is going to change the demands of the majority of logical thinking citizens and legal residents.
Most national newspapers and the media, always categorizes ALL people who enter America as immigrants!
There is a stark difference between those people who are inspected for contagious diseases, criminal backgrounds and have been issued a entry visa.
People who ignore THE PEOPLE'S laws are illegal immigrants or illegal aliens?
In most newspapers the editors have been brain-washed or lobotimised, because they refuse to illustrate the massive difference between legal and illegal.
Their IS no exception to this rule. It is a travesty of our immigration enforcement laws! Neither political parties can be trusted when it comes to the illegal immigration occupation of our country.
More states are trying to enact strict laws for enforcement against predator employers. However, THE SAVE ACT has the teeth and packs the punch, to halt this pestilence overwhelming our wilting economy.
Very few Senators and Representatives have THE PEOPLE' S best interest in mind. The Democratic hierarchy have specifically been pandering to special interest groups, and very few have offered to co-author THE FEDERAL SAVE ACT.
CALL YOUR FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LEADERS, REGISTER YOUR OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to keep our country from enforcing its immigration laws!
Learn the suppressed news about the border fence at: AmericanPatrol READ THE RAW TRUTH AT NUMBERSUSA!
Great Comment by Dave Francis - Indianapolis, IN
UNHAPPY AMERICAN
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogsite.com
Most national newspapers and the media, always categorizes ALL people who enter America as immigrants!
There is a stark difference between those people who are inspected for contagious diseases, criminal backgrounds and have been issued a entry visa.
People who ignore THE PEOPLE'S laws are illegal immigrants or illegal aliens?
In most newspapers the editors have been brain-washed or lobotimised, because they refuse to illustrate the massive difference between legal and illegal.
Their IS no exception to this rule. It is a travesty of our immigration enforcement laws! Neither political parties can be trusted when it comes to the illegal immigration occupation of our country.
More states are trying to enact strict laws for enforcement against predator employers. However, THE SAVE ACT has the teeth and packs the punch, to halt this pestilence overwhelming our wilting economy.
Very few Senators and Representatives have THE PEOPLE' S best interest in mind. The Democratic hierarchy have specifically been pandering to special interest groups, and very few have offered to co-author THE FEDERAL SAVE ACT.
CALL YOUR FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LEADERS, REGISTER YOUR OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to keep our country from enforcing its immigration laws!
Learn the suppressed news about the border fence at: AmericanPatrol READ THE RAW TRUTH AT NUMBERSUSA!
Great Comment by Dave Francis - Indianapolis, IN
UNHAPPY AMERICAN
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogsite.com
Saturday, March 29, 2008
AMERICA, IT'S TIME TO WAKE UP
Are Americans capable of understanding their plight? It has been said that most can neither do simple math nor comprehend what they read. That may explain why they do not see what is happening to their country, or why they do not seem to care. Yet, those with these basic skills also appear gullible to the propaganda they are continually fed. Is the answer, that the message is so desirable that they cannot resist accepting?
Now, who could resist such ideas as "more is better," "we are creating jobs," "diversity is beautible," "globalization is inevitable and we must adjust to compete," "cheap labor will reduce prices," "growth increases economic wealth," "we need growth to save our social security system," and "free-trade will boost the economy." They do sound inviting, desirable, and difficult to resist, because they so plausible. Yet, these ideas are causing our nation to disintegrate.
The drum beaters proclaim that globalization is the answer. If we expand to foreign markets, our economy will grow through the melding of our economy with the global economy by free trade, capital mobility, and uncontrolled migration. The result is an erasure of our national
boundary for economic purposes. The shifts in trade patterns have resulted in the loss of millions of jobs, contributed to declining real income and making the U.S. the largest debtor
nation. We have lost U.S. captial and U.S. labor cooperating to produce U.S. goods to compete against other nations. The result means that without employing U.S. labor these global capitalists will be unable to sell their products, because of loss in our purchasing power. Can we say the benefits outweigh the negatives?
If more is better, how can we ever resist having even more? With only 4.8% of the world's population we consume 25% of the oil, and 30% of world materials. We import more than $700
billion more than we export. We borrow $3 billion per day to fuel our greed. We are fast approaching the time when we will be unable to pay our debt, which now cost us $400 million daily to just pay the interest on the $9.2 trillion. We are told growth will get us out of debt.
If only we could grow faster, our problems would disappear.
The economist would have you believe that the foundation of our economy is growth. We grow our population with legal immigrants and illegal aliens as a means of maintaining our consumption-based economy.
Consider, the following and then ask yourself is this what you want for your children, grandchildren, or should we get really serious about controlling both legal and illegal immigration. Between 1990 through 2000 we added 32.7 million people; an increase of 13.1 percent. If we continue on this path our population in 2020, 2040, 2060, 2080 and 2100 will be 360, 460, 589, 753 and 964 million, respectively.
Agronomists and ecologists have a different view of population growth. Piemental and Giampietro (1994) indicated the U.S. has about 400 million fertile acres, and estinates are that
one acre of land is lost to urbanization and highway construction for every person added to the
population. They estimate that by 2025 we will be forced to cease exporting food in order to
provide for the increase in our own population or continue to borrow in order to buy it from other countries. We are already on the verge of bankruptcy because of the expanding population. Can we continue to pave over our nation? At what point do we exceed the carrying capacity of our arable land? How much genetically inspired food do you want to ingest?
Someone is suggesting that we taxpayers subsidize farmers to delay them from selling their land. When Joe Farmer sees the sign on his neighbor's land that says "200 acres for sale, $40,000 per acre," you can bet he is calculating. "Now, that's a cool $8,000,000 today, and I am 65, and..." Obviously, the state doesn't have enough money to compete. So, if you want to preserve farmland you had better seriously re-think the growth model.
Besides why are we allowing the destruction of this nation? Can we not see the damage being
done by the greed of some individuals and international corporations, at the expense of our environment, our economy, our quality of life? Why should economic growth be more important
than the happiness of the citizens? I do not need another exotic restaurant to be content! How
long will it be before our debt outstrips our ability to pay even the interest on the debt???
What then will happen to growth???
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Another Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Now, who could resist such ideas as "more is better," "we are creating jobs," "diversity is beautible," "globalization is inevitable and we must adjust to compete," "cheap labor will reduce prices," "growth increases economic wealth," "we need growth to save our social security system," and "free-trade will boost the economy." They do sound inviting, desirable, and difficult to resist, because they so plausible. Yet, these ideas are causing our nation to disintegrate.
The drum beaters proclaim that globalization is the answer. If we expand to foreign markets, our economy will grow through the melding of our economy with the global economy by free trade, capital mobility, and uncontrolled migration. The result is an erasure of our national
boundary for economic purposes. The shifts in trade patterns have resulted in the loss of millions of jobs, contributed to declining real income and making the U.S. the largest debtor
nation. We have lost U.S. captial and U.S. labor cooperating to produce U.S. goods to compete against other nations. The result means that without employing U.S. labor these global capitalists will be unable to sell their products, because of loss in our purchasing power. Can we say the benefits outweigh the negatives?
If more is better, how can we ever resist having even more? With only 4.8% of the world's population we consume 25% of the oil, and 30% of world materials. We import more than $700
billion more than we export. We borrow $3 billion per day to fuel our greed. We are fast approaching the time when we will be unable to pay our debt, which now cost us $400 million daily to just pay the interest on the $9.2 trillion. We are told growth will get us out of debt.
If only we could grow faster, our problems would disappear.
The economist would have you believe that the foundation of our economy is growth. We grow our population with legal immigrants and illegal aliens as a means of maintaining our consumption-based economy.
Consider, the following and then ask yourself is this what you want for your children, grandchildren, or should we get really serious about controlling both legal and illegal immigration. Between 1990 through 2000 we added 32.7 million people; an increase of 13.1 percent. If we continue on this path our population in 2020, 2040, 2060, 2080 and 2100 will be 360, 460, 589, 753 and 964 million, respectively.
Agronomists and ecologists have a different view of population growth. Piemental and Giampietro (1994) indicated the U.S. has about 400 million fertile acres, and estinates are that
one acre of land is lost to urbanization and highway construction for every person added to the
population. They estimate that by 2025 we will be forced to cease exporting food in order to
provide for the increase in our own population or continue to borrow in order to buy it from other countries. We are already on the verge of bankruptcy because of the expanding population. Can we continue to pave over our nation? At what point do we exceed the carrying capacity of our arable land? How much genetically inspired food do you want to ingest?
Someone is suggesting that we taxpayers subsidize farmers to delay them from selling their land. When Joe Farmer sees the sign on his neighbor's land that says "200 acres for sale, $40,000 per acre," you can bet he is calculating. "Now, that's a cool $8,000,000 today, and I am 65, and..." Obviously, the state doesn't have enough money to compete. So, if you want to preserve farmland you had better seriously re-think the growth model.
Besides why are we allowing the destruction of this nation? Can we not see the damage being
done by the greed of some individuals and international corporations, at the expense of our environment, our economy, our quality of life? Why should economic growth be more important
than the happiness of the citizens? I do not need another exotic restaurant to be content! How
long will it be before our debt outstrips our ability to pay even the interest on the debt???
What then will happen to growth???
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Another Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Friday, March 28, 2008
IDAHO: A Guest Opinion on Growth
An important topic is growth, including population growth that fuels the economic monster. Our Treasure Valley is not immune to growth, and as you well know we are suffering under the weight of our expansion. The legislature is having an increasingly difficult time getting the necessary funds to pay for all the things necessary to continue growing. Doesn't anyone have a better idea than adding more people?
Progress comes at a price for those caught in the maelstrom of growth.
Brainwashed Americans believe growth is necessary for the assumed benefit of higher incomes and the distribution of taxes over a larger base. This philosophy has accelerated the destruction of our God given heritage---the land.
We have lost 50 percent of the original wetlands, 90 percent of old growth forests, 99 percent of our prairies, and currently losing topsoil at a rate 20 times the rate that it can be replaced.
Obviously, our leaders are "stuck on stupid” if they believe that growth can be managed, regulated, or controlled while still promoting population growth.
How well are we managing growth? It should be evident that on a national level we are not doing so well. In less than 50 years we have increased our population from 150 million in 1960 to more than 300 million today. Eighty percent is due to immigration (both legal and illegal). In 1960 our debt was 310 billion; today it is approaching 10 trillion and does not include the 50 trillion in IOU's to social security and medicare. Millions of jobs have been outsourced. Much of our manufacturing has moved to countries with cheaper labor, because our government has instituted unfair trade deals. One must conclude there is a strong correlation, and no doubt a causal relation, between population and debt.
Taxpayers, not businesses, feel the pain when we add more lanes to I-84, add emission testing, build larger jails, provide drug treatment facilities, build another 100 subdivisions, and add luxury seating for those that can afford the view. All the while government encourages large corporations, along with their need for more cheap workers to come to Idaho, and do so tax-free? In this whirlwind we are continually in a state of catch up. There is never enough money to fund the needs that growth demands. In a panic our legislators use their only weapon; impose more taxes. And, who pays?
The Idaho Department of Labor, August 2007, says our personal income rose 9.9 percent in the Boise Metro area from 2005. The Statesman, in October 2007, said Idaho's cost of living outpaces wages. Eighty-seven percent of open jobs pay less than a living wage. An Idaho Community Action Network study said a single adult with two kids needs to earn $23.44 per hour to cover necessities. Not even the average Micron worker earned that much. Who pays such wages when illegal aliens work at near minimum wages and legitimize that scale?
Does it ever occur to our smart growth managers that adding more people to the mix increases the amounts of governmental services, increases the need for more infrastructures, while simultaneously increasing demands from our limited resources? Do they really care? Business and professional groups having a common economic interest in promoting growth, only fund the election of candidates that are willing to support their view. Once elected the officials reward their benefactors with incentives and subsidies that stimulate further growth regardless of the impacts on the citizenry. Remember, all growth has it’s limits!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Progress comes at a price for those caught in the maelstrom of growth.
Brainwashed Americans believe growth is necessary for the assumed benefit of higher incomes and the distribution of taxes over a larger base. This philosophy has accelerated the destruction of our God given heritage---the land.
We have lost 50 percent of the original wetlands, 90 percent of old growth forests, 99 percent of our prairies, and currently losing topsoil at a rate 20 times the rate that it can be replaced.
Obviously, our leaders are "stuck on stupid” if they believe that growth can be managed, regulated, or controlled while still promoting population growth.
How well are we managing growth? It should be evident that on a national level we are not doing so well. In less than 50 years we have increased our population from 150 million in 1960 to more than 300 million today. Eighty percent is due to immigration (both legal and illegal). In 1960 our debt was 310 billion; today it is approaching 10 trillion and does not include the 50 trillion in IOU's to social security and medicare. Millions of jobs have been outsourced. Much of our manufacturing has moved to countries with cheaper labor, because our government has instituted unfair trade deals. One must conclude there is a strong correlation, and no doubt a causal relation, between population and debt.
Taxpayers, not businesses, feel the pain when we add more lanes to I-84, add emission testing, build larger jails, provide drug treatment facilities, build another 100 subdivisions, and add luxury seating for those that can afford the view. All the while government encourages large corporations, along with their need for more cheap workers to come to Idaho, and do so tax-free? In this whirlwind we are continually in a state of catch up. There is never enough money to fund the needs that growth demands. In a panic our legislators use their only weapon; impose more taxes. And, who pays?
The Idaho Department of Labor, August 2007, says our personal income rose 9.9 percent in the Boise Metro area from 2005. The Statesman, in October 2007, said Idaho's cost of living outpaces wages. Eighty-seven percent of open jobs pay less than a living wage. An Idaho Community Action Network study said a single adult with two kids needs to earn $23.44 per hour to cover necessities. Not even the average Micron worker earned that much. Who pays such wages when illegal aliens work at near minimum wages and legitimize that scale?
Does it ever occur to our smart growth managers that adding more people to the mix increases the amounts of governmental services, increases the need for more infrastructures, while simultaneously increasing demands from our limited resources? Do they really care? Business and professional groups having a common economic interest in promoting growth, only fund the election of candidates that are willing to support their view. Once elected the officials reward their benefactors with incentives and subsidies that stimulate further growth regardless of the impacts on the citizenry. Remember, all growth has it’s limits!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Judge stops deportation proceedings against Danbury family because of anchor babies
A federal judge ruled in favor of the defendant and has stopped deportation proceedings against a Danbury family. The judge said that deporting Tereza Pereira and Carlos Lima would result in an exceptional hardship on their two American-born sons, one of which is an honor student at Danbury High School.
Comments:
Without reading the decision, this is a travesty of justice. The two parents are here illegally, those that employ them are violating the law and those that rent to them are violating the law.
All subject to fines and imprisonment.The "anchor baby" children are not American citizens simply because of birth in the United States because they are sons of people who are not citizens.
In the same sense, that a son or daughter of a foreign diplomat born in the United States, is not a citizens.
The rationale that their deportation would cause undue hardship to the anchor babies is a judge making up the law. Nowhere in the immigration law is anything like that remotely proposed. By the same line of argument, one could argue that parents who robbed a bank should not have to give up the money because it would be an undue hardship on their children.
I think this will be a very important case, and should be argued to the Supreme Court. It has ramifications far beyond Danbury and impacts millions of anchor babies born in the United States. I am not so sure why they will immediately get any green card, but note if the millions of anchor baby children are deemed citizens, then under family unification, a one-year old can apply for entry of its parents. In fact, a de facto amnesty.
The impact of illegal immigration, while having these touching personal stories, is an unmitigated disaster for American citizens. Ecologically it means going from a population of 300 million (far too high) to 450 million in about fifty million years. Economically, it will impact the poorest Americans and send states like California into bankruptcy. Politically, it will mean that Los Angeles will probably declare itself independent from the U.S.(as Kosovo), Reconquista will be accomplished and California, AZ, NM and TX will become part of Texas.
Those who are championing this open borders decision better be prepared to know what they are heading toward, if decisions like this are finally the law of the land.
On 7/7/06, Mexican American professor Armando Navarro, who has organized many pro-illegal alien rallies, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times as saying, "A new majority is forming. Everything will change. The White House will be within our reach. We might have to change the name to the Brown House."
(thanks to Chuck Hammer for putting out the alert)
Unhappy American
Comments:
Without reading the decision, this is a travesty of justice. The two parents are here illegally, those that employ them are violating the law and those that rent to them are violating the law.
All subject to fines and imprisonment.The "anchor baby" children are not American citizens simply because of birth in the United States because they are sons of people who are not citizens.
In the same sense, that a son or daughter of a foreign diplomat born in the United States, is not a citizens.
The rationale that their deportation would cause undue hardship to the anchor babies is a judge making up the law. Nowhere in the immigration law is anything like that remotely proposed. By the same line of argument, one could argue that parents who robbed a bank should not have to give up the money because it would be an undue hardship on their children.
I think this will be a very important case, and should be argued to the Supreme Court. It has ramifications far beyond Danbury and impacts millions of anchor babies born in the United States. I am not so sure why they will immediately get any green card, but note if the millions of anchor baby children are deemed citizens, then under family unification, a one-year old can apply for entry of its parents. In fact, a de facto amnesty.
The impact of illegal immigration, while having these touching personal stories, is an unmitigated disaster for American citizens. Ecologically it means going from a population of 300 million (far too high) to 450 million in about fifty million years. Economically, it will impact the poorest Americans and send states like California into bankruptcy. Politically, it will mean that Los Angeles will probably declare itself independent from the U.S.(as Kosovo), Reconquista will be accomplished and California, AZ, NM and TX will become part of Texas.
Those who are championing this open borders decision better be prepared to know what they are heading toward, if decisions like this are finally the law of the land.
On 7/7/06, Mexican American professor Armando Navarro, who has organized many pro-illegal alien rallies, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times as saying, "A new majority is forming. Everything will change. The White House will be within our reach. We might have to change the name to the Brown House."
(thanks to Chuck Hammer for putting out the alert)
Unhappy American
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
THE BIBLE WARNS US OF BARACK OBAMA
The Bible has warned us that 'A man will come from the East that will be charismatic in nature and have proposed solutions for all our problems and his rhetoric will attract many supporters!
'When will our pathetic Nation quit turning their back on God and understand that this man is 'A Muslim'....First, Last and always....and we are AT WAR with the Muslim Nation, whether our bleeding-heart, secular, Liberal friends believe it or not. This man fits every description from the Bible of the 'Anti-Christ'!
I'm just glad to know that there are others that are frightened by this man! Who is Barack Obama?
Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice. If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts...this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it and share it.
Snopes. com ..' confirms this is factual. Check for yourself.
WHO IS BARACK?
Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita , Kansas.
Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii.
When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocated to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, 'He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school.
'Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical.
Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son's education.
Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta.
Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world.
Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. Do we know that to be true?
Barack Hussein Obama, will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama might turn his back to the flag, who knows?
Do you want someone like this as your PRESIDENT?
Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy.
The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!
Please forward to everyone you know.
Would you want this man leading our country?...... NOT ME!
Unhappy American
'When will our pathetic Nation quit turning their back on God and understand that this man is 'A Muslim'....First, Last and always....and we are AT WAR with the Muslim Nation, whether our bleeding-heart, secular, Liberal friends believe it or not. This man fits every description from the Bible of the 'Anti-Christ'!
I'm just glad to know that there are others that are frightened by this man! Who is Barack Obama?
Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice. If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts...this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it and share it.
Snopes. com ..' confirms this is factual. Check for yourself.
WHO IS BARACK?
Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita , Kansas.
Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii.
When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocated to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, 'He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school.
'Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical.
Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son's education.
Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta.
Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world.
Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. Do we know that to be true?
Barack Hussein Obama, will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama might turn his back to the flag, who knows?
Do you want someone like this as your PRESIDENT?
Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy.
The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!
Please forward to everyone you know.
Would you want this man leading our country?...... NOT ME!
Unhappy American
Monday, March 24, 2008
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: (Published) Idaho Press-Tribune, October 2, 2006
The Meaning of Illegal and Amnesty…..Let’s Stop the Word Games, please…..
Entering the Unites States, other then by legal means, is a violation of U.S. law and is therefore, “illegal.”
Any foreign citizen that has entered the United States, other then by legal means, is in violation of U.S. law and illegally residing in the United States and is therefore subject to arrest and deportation for violating U. S. law.
Any plan that will allow people in the Unites States “illegally” stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation, is therefore an, “Amnesty.“
The McCain (Reid)/Kennedy plan, which allowed people in the United States “illegally” to stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation is an, “Amnesty“ and therefore, those supporting McCain's plan; granting “Amnesty” to people in the United States illegally, regardless of how they try to disguise the plan, it is still an “Amnesty“ plan.
Any plan that not only provides an “Amnesty” for those in the United States “illegally” but also allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not only an “Amnesty” for violating America law, but a reward for violating American law, which makes having that law useless.
A nation without a border is not a nation, therefore, any plan that allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not in the nations best interest and may cause the loss of U.S. sovereignty over it's own territorial borders, which will eliminate the United States of America as a sovereign nation of the world, which would therefore make advocating such a plan not only stupid, but close to being treasonous. Get it?
You're a traitor and a criminal if you aid and abet an “illegal alien” even if you change the language to "Undocumented Immigrant". It's a nice criminal try though.....
Unhappy American
Additional Immigration Information: http://www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com/
Entering the Unites States, other then by legal means, is a violation of U.S. law and is therefore, “illegal.”
Any foreign citizen that has entered the United States, other then by legal means, is in violation of U.S. law and illegally residing in the United States and is therefore subject to arrest and deportation for violating U. S. law.
Any plan that will allow people in the Unites States “illegally” stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation, is therefore an, “Amnesty.“
The McCain (Reid)/Kennedy plan, which allowed people in the United States “illegally” to stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation is an, “Amnesty“ and therefore, those supporting McCain's plan; granting “Amnesty” to people in the United States illegally, regardless of how they try to disguise the plan, it is still an “Amnesty“ plan.
Any plan that not only provides an “Amnesty” for those in the United States “illegally” but also allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not only an “Amnesty” for violating America law, but a reward for violating American law, which makes having that law useless.
A nation without a border is not a nation, therefore, any plan that allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not in the nations best interest and may cause the loss of U.S. sovereignty over it's own territorial borders, which will eliminate the United States of America as a sovereign nation of the world, which would therefore make advocating such a plan not only stupid, but close to being treasonous. Get it?
You're a traitor and a criminal if you aid and abet an “illegal alien” even if you change the language to "Undocumented Immigrant". It's a nice criminal try though.....
Unhappy American
Additional Immigration Information: http://www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com/
WHO CARES? WHO CARES? WHO CARES?
It is not difficult to understand why the President and Congress want amnesty for 30 million illegal aliens, allow another 60 million of their relatives to come, and permit the other 40 million in Mexico to come in when the North American Open Borders policy takes effect by 2010?
But, what gives the President and the other misfits the right to destroy this country without our consent? Wouldn't you at least feel better if they asked for our permission? One gets the opinion that the people have given these clowns rights that are not expressly apart of our U.S. Constitution...you know that g-- d--- piece of paper that Bush refers to.
If not, why are we being so pathetically meek in our response to their egregious attacks on our freedoms under some guise of "War on Terror?" Is that not an act of terror to allow open borders? Help me to understand why watching football, curled up with a mountain of chips drooling with salsa, is more important than saving one's country? Doesn't it occur to "Joe Sixpack, or his fellow compadres," that if they want to enjoy their 3-4 hours of bliss they better start paying attention to what the government and the secret police are up to? He and his pals may have to work those hours in a sweat shop to pay for the chips and salsa, but not have the time nor resources to watch or afford the state controlled TV sets.
Do you comprehend what American's want from their country? I am having difficulty.
Additional Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
UnhappyAmerican
Jack M. Moutrie
But, what gives the President and the other misfits the right to destroy this country without our consent? Wouldn't you at least feel better if they asked for our permission? One gets the opinion that the people have given these clowns rights that are not expressly apart of our U.S. Constitution...you know that g-- d--- piece of paper that Bush refers to.
If not, why are we being so pathetically meek in our response to their egregious attacks on our freedoms under some guise of "War on Terror?" Is that not an act of terror to allow open borders? Help me to understand why watching football, curled up with a mountain of chips drooling with salsa, is more important than saving one's country? Doesn't it occur to "Joe Sixpack, or his fellow compadres," that if they want to enjoy their 3-4 hours of bliss they better start paying attention to what the government and the secret police are up to? He and his pals may have to work those hours in a sweat shop to pay for the chips and salsa, but not have the time nor resources to watch or afford the state controlled TV sets.
Do you comprehend what American's want from their country? I am having difficulty.
Additional Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
UnhappyAmerican
Jack M. Moutrie
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Senator Barack Obama's Illegal Alien position?
In response to the recent appearance of Sen. Barack Obama at Taco Bell Arena in Boise Idaho,
I sent a letter to Keith Roark, State Chairman of the Idaho Democratic Party requesting the following information:
I might add the letter was published in the Idaho Press-Tribune, March 23, 2008.
State Chairman: Keith Roark
It is of great interest to me that 14,000 people would fill Taco Bell Arena to encourage the promotion of a most Liberal Presidential Candidate.
Candidate Obama’s agenda promotes immediate pathway to citizenship for all illegal aliens, while, at the same time, providing legal drivers’ license for all foreign nationals.
There are some of us in Idaho who are concerned his one word mantra of “change” is nothing more than advancing socialism in the United States..
All the above actions would make more illegal and legal persons dependent on the federal government at the expense of businesses and taxpayers.
Is the Democratic Party of Idaho in full support of Sen. Obama’s positions? Does the Party condone ignoring our immigration laws? Is it no concern of the Party that rewarding individuals who have compromised the sovereignty of this nation by entering this country illegally only serves as a magnet to attract additional unlawful entry? Will America be benefited by the forthcoming additional illegal entry of uneducated, unskilled foreign nationals?
As a concerned (Independent) American, I have concerns about the agendas of all the present presidential candidates. It particularly concerns me that people can be so easily fascinated with the charisma of a candidate such as Sen. Obama and, possibly?, be ignorant of his agenda.
I feel this will be a crucial election for this nation. I think we should all make ourselves aware of the positions of the presidential candidates. Thus, I am contacting you for clarification of the Idaho Democratic Party’s positions.
I await your response,
Jack M. Moutrie
One Unhappy American
I sent a letter to Keith Roark, State Chairman of the Idaho Democratic Party requesting the following information:
I might add the letter was published in the Idaho Press-Tribune, March 23, 2008.
State Chairman: Keith Roark
It is of great interest to me that 14,000 people would fill Taco Bell Arena to encourage the promotion of a most Liberal Presidential Candidate.
Candidate Obama’s agenda promotes immediate pathway to citizenship for all illegal aliens, while, at the same time, providing legal drivers’ license for all foreign nationals.
There are some of us in Idaho who are concerned his one word mantra of “change” is nothing more than advancing socialism in the United States..
All the above actions would make more illegal and legal persons dependent on the federal government at the expense of businesses and taxpayers.
Is the Democratic Party of Idaho in full support of Sen. Obama’s positions? Does the Party condone ignoring our immigration laws? Is it no concern of the Party that rewarding individuals who have compromised the sovereignty of this nation by entering this country illegally only serves as a magnet to attract additional unlawful entry? Will America be benefited by the forthcoming additional illegal entry of uneducated, unskilled foreign nationals?
As a concerned (Independent) American, I have concerns about the agendas of all the present presidential candidates. It particularly concerns me that people can be so easily fascinated with the charisma of a candidate such as Sen. Obama and, possibly?, be ignorant of his agenda.
I feel this will be a crucial election for this nation. I think we should all make ourselves aware of the positions of the presidential candidates. Thus, I am contacting you for clarification of the Idaho Democratic Party’s positions.
I await your response,
Jack M. Moutrie
One Unhappy American
Friday, September 21, 2007
RESIGN LARRY CRAIG, PLEASE! NOW!
Whether Senator Larry Craig exonerates his tainted name is not the issue. Although many have extolled his value to Idaho because of his seniority for being able to gain federal dollars (read taxpayers money) for special programs (read special interests), the dark side is that he does not listen to the People. The majority of the People do not want more immigration, but less.
Craig's AgJobs bill is an example. When first conceived it was being sold as correcting a difficulty that farmers had in getting H-2A visas. It did not pass. Now, in its present form it grants illegal aliens the right to stay in the country, work in agriculture for three years, and then be given permanent status to remain. Then they are free to move onto other jobs. It should not pass. If Craig remains, by what stealth move will he use to get this atrocious bill passed?
The entire guest workers' concept is bogus, because it is a program that continually requires new workers each year to replace those that move onto higher paying jobs. These workers will be allowed to bring their families and produce untold numbers of new citizens of which many will end on welfare rolls. It will not reduce the price of products, but it will increase our population to unbearable levels.
Craig claims we need 500,000 immigrants yearly to achieve an economic growth of 3.5 percent annually, just so we can fund social security for the baby boomer's retirements. How will we then pay for retirements of those who came to pay for the boomers? Had Congress not continually raided the trust fund, this might not be necessary.
Economic growth is just like the "Ponzi" scheme of Social Security. You just cannot continue to add more people to gain more economic wealth without recognizing that there are limits to growth. P.A. Madison (www.federalistblog.us/
Craig, and the other pro-illegal alien lobbies, are lulling us to sleep. They still want cheap labor and amnesty for illegal aliens and are exploring every angle to push it down our throats. Craig has made it amply clear he is pro-amnesty. The only real solution is to enforce the entire law, and send every illegal alien back to their home countries. If you dare believe Senator Craig on the recent crackdown, "That's the law. It's being enforced, and it should be enforced." Tell Craig and others, to apply that accurate analysis to all of the current immigration law? We are tired of hearing the "law is broken, " when you know the President and Administration have been totally negligent in enforcing our laws. They all want open borders.....
If he reneges on his resignation tell him he needs to revisit the birthright clause of the 14th Amendment, because he and his colleagues have misinterpreted its "intent"? The Amendment excluded children of aliens from becoming automatic citizens. Therefore, those granted citizenship by this misinterpretation should be retroactively declared as aliens.
Another new gimmick to twist the American citizens mind, is illegal alien students hoping to join the armed forces, a path to permanent legal status.
While you're at it, tell him to severely reduce those who may be included in family reunification, since they, Congress are working 24/7 to totally destroy America!
A Senator's first duty is to represent and support the citizens', not illegal aliens!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho.....
Craig's AgJobs bill is an example. When first conceived it was being sold as correcting a difficulty that farmers had in getting H-2A visas. It did not pass. Now, in its present form it grants illegal aliens the right to stay in the country, work in agriculture for three years, and then be given permanent status to remain. Then they are free to move onto other jobs. It should not pass. If Craig remains, by what stealth move will he use to get this atrocious bill passed?
The entire guest workers' concept is bogus, because it is a program that continually requires new workers each year to replace those that move onto higher paying jobs. These workers will be allowed to bring their families and produce untold numbers of new citizens of which many will end on welfare rolls. It will not reduce the price of products, but it will increase our population to unbearable levels.
Craig claims we need 500,000 immigrants yearly to achieve an economic growth of 3.5 percent annually, just so we can fund social security for the baby boomer's retirements. How will we then pay for retirements of those who came to pay for the boomers? Had Congress not continually raided the trust fund, this might not be necessary.
Economic growth is just like the "Ponzi" scheme of Social Security. You just cannot continue to add more people to gain more economic wealth without recognizing that there are limits to growth. P.A. Madison (www.federalistblog.us/
Craig, and the other pro-illegal alien lobbies, are lulling us to sleep. They still want cheap labor and amnesty for illegal aliens and are exploring every angle to push it down our throats. Craig has made it amply clear he is pro-amnesty. The only real solution is to enforce the entire law, and send every illegal alien back to their home countries. If you dare believe Senator Craig on the recent crackdown, "That's the law. It's being enforced, and it should be enforced." Tell Craig and others, to apply that accurate analysis to all of the current immigration law? We are tired of hearing the "law is broken, " when you know the President and Administration have been totally negligent in enforcing our laws. They all want open borders.....
If he reneges on his resignation tell him he needs to revisit the birthright clause of the 14th Amendment, because he and his colleagues have misinterpreted its "intent"? The Amendment excluded children of aliens from becoming automatic citizens. Therefore, those granted citizenship by this misinterpretation should be retroactively declared as aliens.
Another new gimmick to twist the American citizens mind, is illegal alien students hoping to join the armed forces, a path to permanent legal status.
While you're at it, tell him to severely reduce those who may be included in family reunification, since they, Congress are working 24/7 to totally destroy America!
A Senator's first duty is to represent and support the citizens', not illegal aliens!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho.....
Sunday, June 03, 2007
TO ANYONE WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN AMERICAN CITIZENS
Is there no sanity in the Senate?
For weeks Ted Kennedy and special interests have been holed up with the President's men, conspiring to foist another amnesty on the American citizens. The current Comprehensive Immigration Reform is a scam based on lies. CIR is a fraud which does not serve the people of this nation. In fact, this amnesty will destroy unity and bankrupt this nation.
The Snake Kennedy said in 1986, "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." He might be lying whether it is amnesty, but he is right the 1986 bill is far better than the current S. 1348. Amnesty for 12 to 30 million illegal aliens will be much more devastating to the United States and her citizens than the 3 million actually granted amnesty from the 1986 bill.
If there is any similarity between S. 1348 and last years S. 2611 we can expect legal immigration to be expanded up to 3-4 million per year. We can only guess whether family reunification will be apart of the new bill. If so, be prepared to see the population expand by another 100 million in the next two decades.
There will be sections devoted to border security and employer sanctions like prior bills, but there is no guarantee that enforcement will ensue. How convenient, the Presidents, Congresses, and administrations will just ignore the law as they have for the past twenty years. If we are nation in 2027 I can envision that we will be having another amnesty for another 20 million illegal aliens.
With a government and Congressmen so willing to lie to the public can we really trust anything that they say? Already, the President is reneging on the Secure Fence Act. It has been said that only two miles out of the approved 700 miles has been built. If it takes two years to build two miles the entire fence will be built in the year 2356. The number of border patrol agents hired has been scaled back. They tell us that the number of apprehensions are down due to presence of the National Guard, or is it that the Border Patrol is afraid to make arrests for fear of being indicted for doing their job?
The government does not tell us the truth about how many illegal aliens enter the U.S. A report by the House Committee on Homeland Security reported, "Federal law enforcement estimates that 10 percent to 30 percent of illegal aliens are actually apprehended and 10 percent to 20 percent of drugs are seized. Therefore, in 2005, as many as 10 to 4 million illegal aliens crossed into the United States; and as much as 4.8 to 2.4 million pounds of cocaine and 25.5 to 12.8 million pounds of marijuana entered the United States." (converted from kg to lbs.) This is totally unacceptable. If this amnesty becomes law, and border security is ignored as expected, these numbers will climb and we will cease to be a nation.
We cannot afford to trust the President and Congress to provide security, because they have and are demonstrating they are not trustworthy. If we believe them we will surely lose once again.
We need a complete moratorium on immigration, with immediate control of the borders, and a policy to promote attrition of illegal aliens in this country. The latter can be done by enforcing current law and stiffening penalties for those that aid and abet, especially those hiring and providing welfare to illegal aliens.
UNHAPPY AMERICAN IN MERIDIAN, IDAHO
For weeks Ted Kennedy and special interests have been holed up with the President's men, conspiring to foist another amnesty on the American citizens. The current Comprehensive Immigration Reform is a scam based on lies. CIR is a fraud which does not serve the people of this nation. In fact, this amnesty will destroy unity and bankrupt this nation.
The Snake Kennedy said in 1986, "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." He might be lying whether it is amnesty, but he is right the 1986 bill is far better than the current S. 1348. Amnesty for 12 to 30 million illegal aliens will be much more devastating to the United States and her citizens than the 3 million actually granted amnesty from the 1986 bill.
If there is any similarity between S. 1348 and last years S. 2611 we can expect legal immigration to be expanded up to 3-4 million per year. We can only guess whether family reunification will be apart of the new bill. If so, be prepared to see the population expand by another 100 million in the next two decades.
There will be sections devoted to border security and employer sanctions like prior bills, but there is no guarantee that enforcement will ensue. How convenient, the Presidents, Congresses, and administrations will just ignore the law as they have for the past twenty years. If we are nation in 2027 I can envision that we will be having another amnesty for another 20 million illegal aliens.
With a government and Congressmen so willing to lie to the public can we really trust anything that they say? Already, the President is reneging on the Secure Fence Act. It has been said that only two miles out of the approved 700 miles has been built. If it takes two years to build two miles the entire fence will be built in the year 2356. The number of border patrol agents hired has been scaled back. They tell us that the number of apprehensions are down due to presence of the National Guard, or is it that the Border Patrol is afraid to make arrests for fear of being indicted for doing their job?
The government does not tell us the truth about how many illegal aliens enter the U.S. A report by the House Committee on Homeland Security reported, "Federal law enforcement estimates that 10 percent to 30 percent of illegal aliens are actually apprehended and 10 percent to 20 percent of drugs are seized. Therefore, in 2005, as many as 10 to 4 million illegal aliens crossed into the United States; and as much as 4.8 to 2.4 million pounds of cocaine and 25.5 to 12.8 million pounds of marijuana entered the United States." (converted from kg to lbs.) This is totally unacceptable. If this amnesty becomes law, and border security is ignored as expected, these numbers will climb and we will cease to be a nation.
We cannot afford to trust the President and Congress to provide security, because they have and are demonstrating they are not trustworthy. If we believe them we will surely lose once again.
We need a complete moratorium on immigration, with immediate control of the borders, and a policy to promote attrition of illegal aliens in this country. The latter can be done by enforcing current law and stiffening penalties for those that aid and abet, especially those hiring and providing welfare to illegal aliens.
UNHAPPY AMERICAN IN MERIDIAN, IDAHO
Friday, April 13, 2007
HOUSEBREAKERS
Hello Everyone:
You might be interested in what some people are thinking about the illegal alien invasion...Look out it may get ugly in the near future, especially if amnesty occurs.
WE ARE GOOD HOUSEBREAKERS!!! We mean you no harm vieja. We just want to take away from you some of what you have. You got plenty and we don’t. That makes it our right.
[This is an email forward that needed passing on in the worst way. It deserves to be posted here as well. My additional comments are in brackets.]
Forward: A lady wrote the best letter in the Editorials in ages!
It explains things better than all the baloney you hear on TV.
Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that
Congress is finally addressing the issue of Illegal Immigration. Certain people are angry that the US might protect its Own Borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.
Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave. But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors; I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hardworking and honest (except for when I broke into your house).
[Don’t ask me to speak for the rest of my people who engage in other criminal behavior besides breaking and entering. I will operate in denial if you tell me any of my countrymen and women steal your things to go buy their drugs or their Miller beer -- or even just food because they are too lazy to work -- or even rape you if they find you are defenseless.]”
According to the protesters, “not only must you let me stay, you must add me to your family's insurance plan, educate my kids, and provide other benefits to me and to my family (my husband will do your yard work because he too is hardworking and honest, except for that breaking in part).”
“If you try to call the police or force me out, I will
[call you vile names like pendeja gringa and pinche guera and] call my friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my right to be there [in defiance of your laws and your sovereignty -- for which I have the utmost contempt].
“It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better myself.”
[read: go where I don't have to work as hard as at home].
I shouldn’t have to shoulder the blame if I am a no-good slob (or some of my relatives are) who can’t keep a nice house without trashing it and the surrounding neighborhood.
I'm hardworking and honest, um, except for well, you know.
“And what a deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of selfishness, prejudice,
[of xenophobia,] and being an anti-housebreaker. Oh yeah, and I want you to learn my language so you can communicate with me.
[I shouldn’t have to pay for my own mental and physical laziness. After all, that is why I left home. To make it there you have to work hard. I’d rather come here and live off you and feed off the scraps from your table. And if enough scraps do not fall my way it is my right to take straight off the table without asking permission and you can’t stop me!]”
Why can't people see how ridiculous this is?!
[Could it be they hate this country that gives them their wealth, their prosperity, and their ease? How VERY INSANE!] Only in America....[No, other countries have made this mistake and succumbed to this lunacy as well -- and are now paying dearly for it.]
If you agree, pass it on (in English). Share it if you see the value of it as a good smile.
If not blow it off -- along with your future Social Security funds….
[that crooked and traitorous politicians are bent on further stealing from us in order to attempt to buy the allegiance of these foreign invaders.]
End of Forward
Arthur Warchol Wylie, Texas Arthur21743(at)yahoo.com
Additional Immigration Information: http://all-about-illegal-immigration.com
You might be interested in what some people are thinking about the illegal alien invasion...Look out it may get ugly in the near future, especially if amnesty occurs.
WE ARE GOOD HOUSEBREAKERS!!! We mean you no harm vieja. We just want to take away from you some of what you have. You got plenty and we don’t. That makes it our right.
[This is an email forward that needed passing on in the worst way. It deserves to be posted here as well. My additional comments are in brackets.]
Forward: A lady wrote the best letter in the Editorials in ages!
It explains things better than all the baloney you hear on TV.
Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that
Congress is finally addressing the issue of Illegal Immigration. Certain people are angry that the US might protect its Own Borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.
Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave. But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors; I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hardworking and honest (except for when I broke into your house).
[Don’t ask me to speak for the rest of my people who engage in other criminal behavior besides breaking and entering. I will operate in denial if you tell me any of my countrymen and women steal your things to go buy their drugs or their Miller beer -- or even just food because they are too lazy to work -- or even rape you if they find you are defenseless.]”
According to the protesters, “not only must you let me stay, you must add me to your family's insurance plan, educate my kids, and provide other benefits to me and to my family (my husband will do your yard work because he too is hardworking and honest, except for that breaking in part).”
“If you try to call the police or force me out, I will
[call you vile names like pendeja gringa and pinche guera and] call my friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my right to be there [in defiance of your laws and your sovereignty -- for which I have the utmost contempt].
“It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better myself.”
[read: go where I don't have to work as hard as at home].
I shouldn’t have to shoulder the blame if I am a no-good slob (or some of my relatives are) who can’t keep a nice house without trashing it and the surrounding neighborhood.
I'm hardworking and honest, um, except for well, you know.
“And what a deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of selfishness, prejudice,
[of xenophobia,] and being an anti-housebreaker. Oh yeah, and I want you to learn my language so you can communicate with me.
[I shouldn’t have to pay for my own mental and physical laziness. After all, that is why I left home. To make it there you have to work hard. I’d rather come here and live off you and feed off the scraps from your table. And if enough scraps do not fall my way it is my right to take straight off the table without asking permission and you can’t stop me!]”
Why can't people see how ridiculous this is?!
[Could it be they hate this country that gives them their wealth, their prosperity, and their ease? How VERY INSANE!] Only in America....[No, other countries have made this mistake and succumbed to this lunacy as well -- and are now paying dearly for it.]
If you agree, pass it on (in English). Share it if you see the value of it as a good smile.
If not blow it off -- along with your future Social Security funds….
[that crooked and traitorous politicians are bent on further stealing from us in order to attempt to buy the allegiance of these foreign invaders.]
End of Forward
Arthur Warchol Wylie, Texas Arthur21743(at)yahoo.com
Additional Immigration Information: http://all-about-illegal-immigration.com
Saturday, February 17, 2007
AMERICA: By, For and of the People?
Dear Idaho Legislators:
As you know the subject of immigration is in the forefront, and if not on your agenda it should be.
Illegal aliens are an immense problem in the United States, of which I will remind you, Idaho is a part and shares equally in the responsibility of upholding our laws.
I will not go into all the issues regarding illegal aliens and their impacts on Idaho citizens, other than to focus on growth (both economic and population).
It is estimated that in the United States there is between 12 and 30 million illegal aliens.
Obviously, those who wish to minimize impacts choose the lower number, while we who tend to read statistics on border crossings, labor numbers, school enrollments, and other measures believe the true numbers are closer to the 30 million.
The population in the United States just topped 300 million, with projections of being 500 million by mid century and one billion by centuries end.
Bills before the United States Congress, if passed, will ensure this number.
In fact, the projections might be low if the President sees fit to up the number of asylum and refugee cases he allows, the number of legal immigrants is increased from one to 2-3 million, and illegal immigration continues unabated.
Top this with “family reunification” and permitting babies born to illegal aliens to become citizens, thus assuring they are all allowed to remain in the country.
As Frosty Wooldridge writing for NewsWithViews (16 Feb 07) stated, "As our numbers increase, our freedoms decrease. The more we increase, the more freedom decreases in every aspect of our lives. Where your commute used to be 15 minutes, it's now 30. Soon, it will be 45 minutes. You can think of a dozen more examples...
" Our astute Idaho Senator, Larry Craig, boldly declared that we will need 500,000 new agricultural workers each year, because they move on to better paying jobs. So, you can see that he believes we need a guest worker program to supply that labor. But, is there some fallacy of reasoning in this economic model?
As you look across the Treasure Valley you see thousands of acres of prime farmland being converted into big money for a very few, an enlarging government to accommodate a surging population (in the words of Canyon County’s Idaho Senate Delegation, “Our population growth has caused meeting rooms to become too small...”), increasing numbers of illegal aliens (up to 60,000 in Idaho, and growing?), and gridlock at every intersection (not to mention the drive from Boise to Nampa).
In light of this madness why is the State encouraging a greater population? It must be because current economic wisdom says we need evermore bodies to feed the economic monster.
This obviously results in the loss of freedoms and makes life less fruitful and more hectic for all.
Who really benefits from uncontrolled growth?
Surely, you cannot believe that we who live in the Treasure Valley are enjoying the growth in population.
Why should the general populace support ever greater population, bigger government, and the inevitable loss in quality of life just to satisfy the desires of a few to become richer?
What do you suppose it will be like when the valley is overrun by another million people and illegal alien gang members are as prevalent as those in Los Angeles?
Don’t you suppose you as legislators should think about the general welfare of your constituents rather than the welfare of those seeking ever greater profits?
Do we really need another McDonald’s or another Taco stand?
It is time to put the breaks on. It is time that Idaho develops their own stringent laws on hiring illegal aliens. Let it be known that illegal aliens are not welcome and will not receive any benefits.
Let it be known Idaho is not a “sanctuary state” and that they are subject to our laws...deportation for unlawfully entering the United States. Let them know that if they are caught a second time, it is a felony, AND THEY WILL GO STRAIGHT TO JAIL.
Tell the Federal Government that Idaho expects that they will enforce the laws they enact, will obey Federal law only if it is Constitutional, and laws will be challenged if perceived to be unconstitutional.
The State needs to tell the Federal government that the people have all rights not specifically granted to the Federal or State governments by the Constitution.
So if the Federal government will not exercise its powers under the Constitution to protect the citizens then the State should take the initiative and do so.
As a sovereign entity it is imperative or the entity will be nothing more than a puppet to the tyranny of a greedy, power hungry, federal government.
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
As you know the subject of immigration is in the forefront, and if not on your agenda it should be.
Illegal aliens are an immense problem in the United States, of which I will remind you, Idaho is a part and shares equally in the responsibility of upholding our laws.
I will not go into all the issues regarding illegal aliens and their impacts on Idaho citizens, other than to focus on growth (both economic and population).
It is estimated that in the United States there is between 12 and 30 million illegal aliens.
Obviously, those who wish to minimize impacts choose the lower number, while we who tend to read statistics on border crossings, labor numbers, school enrollments, and other measures believe the true numbers are closer to the 30 million.
The population in the United States just topped 300 million, with projections of being 500 million by mid century and one billion by centuries end.
Bills before the United States Congress, if passed, will ensure this number.
In fact, the projections might be low if the President sees fit to up the number of asylum and refugee cases he allows, the number of legal immigrants is increased from one to 2-3 million, and illegal immigration continues unabated.
Top this with “family reunification” and permitting babies born to illegal aliens to become citizens, thus assuring they are all allowed to remain in the country.
As Frosty Wooldridge writing for NewsWithViews (16 Feb 07) stated, "As our numbers increase, our freedoms decrease. The more we increase, the more freedom decreases in every aspect of our lives. Where your commute used to be 15 minutes, it's now 30. Soon, it will be 45 minutes. You can think of a dozen more examples...
" Our astute Idaho Senator, Larry Craig, boldly declared that we will need 500,000 new agricultural workers each year, because they move on to better paying jobs. So, you can see that he believes we need a guest worker program to supply that labor. But, is there some fallacy of reasoning in this economic model?
As you look across the Treasure Valley you see thousands of acres of prime farmland being converted into big money for a very few, an enlarging government to accommodate a surging population (in the words of Canyon County’s Idaho Senate Delegation, “Our population growth has caused meeting rooms to become too small...”), increasing numbers of illegal aliens (up to 60,000 in Idaho, and growing?), and gridlock at every intersection (not to mention the drive from Boise to Nampa).
In light of this madness why is the State encouraging a greater population? It must be because current economic wisdom says we need evermore bodies to feed the economic monster.
This obviously results in the loss of freedoms and makes life less fruitful and more hectic for all.
Who really benefits from uncontrolled growth?
Surely, you cannot believe that we who live in the Treasure Valley are enjoying the growth in population.
Why should the general populace support ever greater population, bigger government, and the inevitable loss in quality of life just to satisfy the desires of a few to become richer?
What do you suppose it will be like when the valley is overrun by another million people and illegal alien gang members are as prevalent as those in Los Angeles?
Don’t you suppose you as legislators should think about the general welfare of your constituents rather than the welfare of those seeking ever greater profits?
Do we really need another McDonald’s or another Taco stand?
It is time to put the breaks on. It is time that Idaho develops their own stringent laws on hiring illegal aliens. Let it be known that illegal aliens are not welcome and will not receive any benefits.
Let it be known Idaho is not a “sanctuary state” and that they are subject to our laws...deportation for unlawfully entering the United States. Let them know that if they are caught a second time, it is a felony, AND THEY WILL GO STRAIGHT TO JAIL.
Tell the Federal Government that Idaho expects that they will enforce the laws they enact, will obey Federal law only if it is Constitutional, and laws will be challenged if perceived to be unconstitutional.
The State needs to tell the Federal government that the people have all rights not specifically granted to the Federal or State governments by the Constitution.
So if the Federal government will not exercise its powers under the Constitution to protect the citizens then the State should take the initiative and do so.
As a sovereign entity it is imperative or the entity will be nothing more than a puppet to the tyranny of a greedy, power hungry, federal government.
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, February 03, 2007
Do you want to be an illegal alien too!
November 12, 2006
Sounds very good to me sign me up!
To:President George Bush
Dear President Bush,
As a resident of Maryland and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.
My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to Illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years.
I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.
Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.
Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year. Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as "in-state" tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.
Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.
If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become Illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your assistance.
Your Loyal Constituent,
Marge Palermo
Additional info: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Sounds very good to me sign me up!
To:President George Bush
Dear President Bush,
As a resident of Maryland and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.
My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to Illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years.
I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.
Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.
Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year. Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as "in-state" tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.
Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.
If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become Illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your assistance.
Your Loyal Constituent,
Marge Palermo
Additional info: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
