Are Americans capable of understanding their plight? It has been said that most can neither do simple math nor comprehend what they read. That may explain why they do not see what is happening to their country, or why they do not seem to care. Yet, those with these basic skills also appear gullible to the propaganda they are continually fed. Is the answer, that the message is so desirable that they cannot resist accepting?
Now, who could resist such ideas as "more is better," "we are creating jobs," "diversity is beautible," "globalization is inevitable and we must adjust to compete," "cheap labor will reduce prices," "growth increases economic wealth," "we need growth to save our social security system," and "free-trade will boost the economy." They do sound inviting, desirable, and difficult to resist, because they so plausible. Yet, these ideas are causing our nation to disintegrate.
The drum beaters proclaim that globalization is the answer. If we expand to foreign markets, our economy will grow through the melding of our economy with the global economy by free trade, capital mobility, and uncontrolled migration. The result is an erasure of our national
boundary for economic purposes. The shifts in trade patterns have resulted in the loss of millions of jobs, contributed to declining real income and making the U.S. the largest debtor
nation. We have lost U.S. captial and U.S. labor cooperating to produce U.S. goods to compete against other nations. The result means that without employing U.S. labor these global capitalists will be unable to sell their products, because of loss in our purchasing power. Can we say the benefits outweigh the negatives?
If more is better, how can we ever resist having even more? With only 4.8% of the world's population we consume 25% of the oil, and 30% of world materials. We import more than $700
billion more than we export. We borrow $3 billion per day to fuel our greed. We are fast approaching the time when we will be unable to pay our debt, which now cost us $400 million daily to just pay the interest on the $9.2 trillion. We are told growth will get us out of debt.
If only we could grow faster, our problems would disappear.
The economist would have you believe that the foundation of our economy is growth. We grow our population with legal immigrants and illegal aliens as a means of maintaining our consumption-based economy.
Consider, the following and then ask yourself is this what you want for your children, grandchildren, or should we get really serious about controlling both legal and illegal immigration. Between 1990 through 2000 we added 32.7 million people; an increase of 13.1 percent. If we continue on this path our population in 2020, 2040, 2060, 2080 and 2100 will be 360, 460, 589, 753 and 964 million, respectively.
Agronomists and ecologists have a different view of population growth. Piemental and Giampietro (1994) indicated the U.S. has about 400 million fertile acres, and estinates are that
one acre of land is lost to urbanization and highway construction for every person added to the
population. They estimate that by 2025 we will be forced to cease exporting food in order to
provide for the increase in our own population or continue to borrow in order to buy it from other countries. We are already on the verge of bankruptcy because of the expanding population. Can we continue to pave over our nation? At what point do we exceed the carrying capacity of our arable land? How much genetically inspired food do you want to ingest?
Someone is suggesting that we taxpayers subsidize farmers to delay them from selling their land. When Joe Farmer sees the sign on his neighbor's land that says "200 acres for sale, $40,000 per acre," you can bet he is calculating. "Now, that's a cool $8,000,000 today, and I am 65, and..." Obviously, the state doesn't have enough money to compete. So, if you want to preserve farmland you had better seriously re-think the growth model.
Besides why are we allowing the destruction of this nation? Can we not see the damage being
done by the greed of some individuals and international corporations, at the expense of our environment, our economy, our quality of life? Why should economic growth be more important
than the happiness of the citizens? I do not need another exotic restaurant to be content! How
long will it be before our debt outstrips our ability to pay even the interest on the debt???
What then will happen to growth???
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Another Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Friday, March 28, 2008
IDAHO: A Guest Opinion on Growth
An important topic is growth, including population growth that fuels the economic monster. Our Treasure Valley is not immune to growth, and as you well know we are suffering under the weight of our expansion. The legislature is having an increasingly difficult time getting the necessary funds to pay for all the things necessary to continue growing. Doesn't anyone have a better idea than adding more people?
Progress comes at a price for those caught in the maelstrom of growth.
Brainwashed Americans believe growth is necessary for the assumed benefit of higher incomes and the distribution of taxes over a larger base. This philosophy has accelerated the destruction of our God given heritage---the land.
We have lost 50 percent of the original wetlands, 90 percent of old growth forests, 99 percent of our prairies, and currently losing topsoil at a rate 20 times the rate that it can be replaced.
Obviously, our leaders are "stuck on stupid” if they believe that growth can be managed, regulated, or controlled while still promoting population growth.
How well are we managing growth? It should be evident that on a national level we are not doing so well. In less than 50 years we have increased our population from 150 million in 1960 to more than 300 million today. Eighty percent is due to immigration (both legal and illegal). In 1960 our debt was 310 billion; today it is approaching 10 trillion and does not include the 50 trillion in IOU's to social security and medicare. Millions of jobs have been outsourced. Much of our manufacturing has moved to countries with cheaper labor, because our government has instituted unfair trade deals. One must conclude there is a strong correlation, and no doubt a causal relation, between population and debt.
Taxpayers, not businesses, feel the pain when we add more lanes to I-84, add emission testing, build larger jails, provide drug treatment facilities, build another 100 subdivisions, and add luxury seating for those that can afford the view. All the while government encourages large corporations, along with their need for more cheap workers to come to Idaho, and do so tax-free? In this whirlwind we are continually in a state of catch up. There is never enough money to fund the needs that growth demands. In a panic our legislators use their only weapon; impose more taxes. And, who pays?
The Idaho Department of Labor, August 2007, says our personal income rose 9.9 percent in the Boise Metro area from 2005. The Statesman, in October 2007, said Idaho's cost of living outpaces wages. Eighty-seven percent of open jobs pay less than a living wage. An Idaho Community Action Network study said a single adult with two kids needs to earn $23.44 per hour to cover necessities. Not even the average Micron worker earned that much. Who pays such wages when illegal aliens work at near minimum wages and legitimize that scale?
Does it ever occur to our smart growth managers that adding more people to the mix increases the amounts of governmental services, increases the need for more infrastructures, while simultaneously increasing demands from our limited resources? Do they really care? Business and professional groups having a common economic interest in promoting growth, only fund the election of candidates that are willing to support their view. Once elected the officials reward their benefactors with incentives and subsidies that stimulate further growth regardless of the impacts on the citizenry. Remember, all growth has it’s limits!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Progress comes at a price for those caught in the maelstrom of growth.
Brainwashed Americans believe growth is necessary for the assumed benefit of higher incomes and the distribution of taxes over a larger base. This philosophy has accelerated the destruction of our God given heritage---the land.
We have lost 50 percent of the original wetlands, 90 percent of old growth forests, 99 percent of our prairies, and currently losing topsoil at a rate 20 times the rate that it can be replaced.
Obviously, our leaders are "stuck on stupid” if they believe that growth can be managed, regulated, or controlled while still promoting population growth.
How well are we managing growth? It should be evident that on a national level we are not doing so well. In less than 50 years we have increased our population from 150 million in 1960 to more than 300 million today. Eighty percent is due to immigration (both legal and illegal). In 1960 our debt was 310 billion; today it is approaching 10 trillion and does not include the 50 trillion in IOU's to social security and medicare. Millions of jobs have been outsourced. Much of our manufacturing has moved to countries with cheaper labor, because our government has instituted unfair trade deals. One must conclude there is a strong correlation, and no doubt a causal relation, between population and debt.
Taxpayers, not businesses, feel the pain when we add more lanes to I-84, add emission testing, build larger jails, provide drug treatment facilities, build another 100 subdivisions, and add luxury seating for those that can afford the view. All the while government encourages large corporations, along with their need for more cheap workers to come to Idaho, and do so tax-free? In this whirlwind we are continually in a state of catch up. There is never enough money to fund the needs that growth demands. In a panic our legislators use their only weapon; impose more taxes. And, who pays?
The Idaho Department of Labor, August 2007, says our personal income rose 9.9 percent in the Boise Metro area from 2005. The Statesman, in October 2007, said Idaho's cost of living outpaces wages. Eighty-seven percent of open jobs pay less than a living wage. An Idaho Community Action Network study said a single adult with two kids needs to earn $23.44 per hour to cover necessities. Not even the average Micron worker earned that much. Who pays such wages when illegal aliens work at near minimum wages and legitimize that scale?
Does it ever occur to our smart growth managers that adding more people to the mix increases the amounts of governmental services, increases the need for more infrastructures, while simultaneously increasing demands from our limited resources? Do they really care? Business and professional groups having a common economic interest in promoting growth, only fund the election of candidates that are willing to support their view. Once elected the officials reward their benefactors with incentives and subsidies that stimulate further growth regardless of the impacts on the citizenry. Remember, all growth has it’s limits!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Judge stops deportation proceedings against Danbury family because of anchor babies
A federal judge ruled in favor of the defendant and has stopped deportation proceedings against a Danbury family. The judge said that deporting Tereza Pereira and Carlos Lima would result in an exceptional hardship on their two American-born sons, one of which is an honor student at Danbury High School.
Comments:
Without reading the decision, this is a travesty of justice. The two parents are here illegally, those that employ them are violating the law and those that rent to them are violating the law.
All subject to fines and imprisonment.The "anchor baby" children are not American citizens simply because of birth in the United States because they are sons of people who are not citizens.
In the same sense, that a son or daughter of a foreign diplomat born in the United States, is not a citizens.
The rationale that their deportation would cause undue hardship to the anchor babies is a judge making up the law. Nowhere in the immigration law is anything like that remotely proposed. By the same line of argument, one could argue that parents who robbed a bank should not have to give up the money because it would be an undue hardship on their children.
I think this will be a very important case, and should be argued to the Supreme Court. It has ramifications far beyond Danbury and impacts millions of anchor babies born in the United States. I am not so sure why they will immediately get any green card, but note if the millions of anchor baby children are deemed citizens, then under family unification, a one-year old can apply for entry of its parents. In fact, a de facto amnesty.
The impact of illegal immigration, while having these touching personal stories, is an unmitigated disaster for American citizens. Ecologically it means going from a population of 300 million (far too high) to 450 million in about fifty million years. Economically, it will impact the poorest Americans and send states like California into bankruptcy. Politically, it will mean that Los Angeles will probably declare itself independent from the U.S.(as Kosovo), Reconquista will be accomplished and California, AZ, NM and TX will become part of Texas.
Those who are championing this open borders decision better be prepared to know what they are heading toward, if decisions like this are finally the law of the land.
On 7/7/06, Mexican American professor Armando Navarro, who has organized many pro-illegal alien rallies, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times as saying, "A new majority is forming. Everything will change. The White House will be within our reach. We might have to change the name to the Brown House."
(thanks to Chuck Hammer for putting out the alert)
Unhappy American
Comments:
Without reading the decision, this is a travesty of justice. The two parents are here illegally, those that employ them are violating the law and those that rent to them are violating the law.
All subject to fines and imprisonment.The "anchor baby" children are not American citizens simply because of birth in the United States because they are sons of people who are not citizens.
In the same sense, that a son or daughter of a foreign diplomat born in the United States, is not a citizens.
The rationale that their deportation would cause undue hardship to the anchor babies is a judge making up the law. Nowhere in the immigration law is anything like that remotely proposed. By the same line of argument, one could argue that parents who robbed a bank should not have to give up the money because it would be an undue hardship on their children.
I think this will be a very important case, and should be argued to the Supreme Court. It has ramifications far beyond Danbury and impacts millions of anchor babies born in the United States. I am not so sure why they will immediately get any green card, but note if the millions of anchor baby children are deemed citizens, then under family unification, a one-year old can apply for entry of its parents. In fact, a de facto amnesty.
The impact of illegal immigration, while having these touching personal stories, is an unmitigated disaster for American citizens. Ecologically it means going from a population of 300 million (far too high) to 450 million in about fifty million years. Economically, it will impact the poorest Americans and send states like California into bankruptcy. Politically, it will mean that Los Angeles will probably declare itself independent from the U.S.(as Kosovo), Reconquista will be accomplished and California, AZ, NM and TX will become part of Texas.
Those who are championing this open borders decision better be prepared to know what they are heading toward, if decisions like this are finally the law of the land.
On 7/7/06, Mexican American professor Armando Navarro, who has organized many pro-illegal alien rallies, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times as saying, "A new majority is forming. Everything will change. The White House will be within our reach. We might have to change the name to the Brown House."
(thanks to Chuck Hammer for putting out the alert)
Unhappy American
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
THE BIBLE WARNS US OF BARACK OBAMA
The Bible has warned us that 'A man will come from the East that will be charismatic in nature and have proposed solutions for all our problems and his rhetoric will attract many supporters!
'When will our pathetic Nation quit turning their back on God and understand that this man is 'A Muslim'....First, Last and always....and we are AT WAR with the Muslim Nation, whether our bleeding-heart, secular, Liberal friends believe it or not. This man fits every description from the Bible of the 'Anti-Christ'!
I'm just glad to know that there are others that are frightened by this man! Who is Barack Obama?
Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice. If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts...this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it and share it.
Snopes. com ..' confirms this is factual. Check for yourself.
WHO IS BARACK?
Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita , Kansas.
Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii.
When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocated to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, 'He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school.
'Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical.
Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son's education.
Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta.
Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world.
Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. Do we know that to be true?
Barack Hussein Obama, will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama might turn his back to the flag, who knows?
Do you want someone like this as your PRESIDENT?
Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy.
The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!
Please forward to everyone you know.
Would you want this man leading our country?...... NOT ME!
Unhappy American
'When will our pathetic Nation quit turning their back on God and understand that this man is 'A Muslim'....First, Last and always....and we are AT WAR with the Muslim Nation, whether our bleeding-heart, secular, Liberal friends believe it or not. This man fits every description from the Bible of the 'Anti-Christ'!
I'm just glad to know that there are others that are frightened by this man! Who is Barack Obama?
Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice. If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts...this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it and share it.
Snopes. com ..' confirms this is factual. Check for yourself.
WHO IS BARACK?
Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita , Kansas.
Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii.
When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia. When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocated to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, 'He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school.
'Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical.
Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son's education.
Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta.
Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world.
Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. Do we know that to be true?
Barack Hussein Obama, will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama might turn his back to the flag, who knows?
Do you want someone like this as your PRESIDENT?
Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy.
The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!
Please forward to everyone you know.
Would you want this man leading our country?...... NOT ME!
Unhappy American
Monday, March 24, 2008
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: (Published) Idaho Press-Tribune, October 2, 2006
The Meaning of Illegal and Amnesty…..Let’s Stop the Word Games, please…..
Entering the Unites States, other then by legal means, is a violation of U.S. law and is therefore, “illegal.”
Any foreign citizen that has entered the United States, other then by legal means, is in violation of U.S. law and illegally residing in the United States and is therefore subject to arrest and deportation for violating U. S. law.
Any plan that will allow people in the Unites States “illegally” stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation, is therefore an, “Amnesty.“
The McCain (Reid)/Kennedy plan, which allowed people in the United States “illegally” to stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation is an, “Amnesty“ and therefore, those supporting McCain's plan; granting “Amnesty” to people in the United States illegally, regardless of how they try to disguise the plan, it is still an “Amnesty“ plan.
Any plan that not only provides an “Amnesty” for those in the United States “illegally” but also allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not only an “Amnesty” for violating America law, but a reward for violating American law, which makes having that law useless.
A nation without a border is not a nation, therefore, any plan that allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not in the nations best interest and may cause the loss of U.S. sovereignty over it's own territorial borders, which will eliminate the United States of America as a sovereign nation of the world, which would therefore make advocating such a plan not only stupid, but close to being treasonous. Get it?
You're a traitor and a criminal if you aid and abet an “illegal alien” even if you change the language to "Undocumented Immigrant". It's a nice criminal try though.....
Unhappy American
Additional Immigration Information: http://www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com/
Entering the Unites States, other then by legal means, is a violation of U.S. law and is therefore, “illegal.”
Any foreign citizen that has entered the United States, other then by legal means, is in violation of U.S. law and illegally residing in the United States and is therefore subject to arrest and deportation for violating U. S. law.
Any plan that will allow people in the Unites States “illegally” stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation, is therefore an, “Amnesty.“
The McCain (Reid)/Kennedy plan, which allowed people in the United States “illegally” to stay in the United States legally, without being subject to arrest and deportation is an, “Amnesty“ and therefore, those supporting McCain's plan; granting “Amnesty” to people in the United States illegally, regardless of how they try to disguise the plan, it is still an “Amnesty“ plan.
Any plan that not only provides an “Amnesty” for those in the United States “illegally” but also allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not only an “Amnesty” for violating America law, but a reward for violating American law, which makes having that law useless.
A nation without a border is not a nation, therefore, any plan that allows a path to U.S. citizenship is not in the nations best interest and may cause the loss of U.S. sovereignty over it's own territorial borders, which will eliminate the United States of America as a sovereign nation of the world, which would therefore make advocating such a plan not only stupid, but close to being treasonous. Get it?
You're a traitor and a criminal if you aid and abet an “illegal alien” even if you change the language to "Undocumented Immigrant". It's a nice criminal try though.....
Unhappy American
Additional Immigration Information: http://www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com/
WHO CARES? WHO CARES? WHO CARES?
It is not difficult to understand why the President and Congress want amnesty for 30 million illegal aliens, allow another 60 million of their relatives to come, and permit the other 40 million in Mexico to come in when the North American Open Borders policy takes effect by 2010?
But, what gives the President and the other misfits the right to destroy this country without our consent? Wouldn't you at least feel better if they asked for our permission? One gets the opinion that the people have given these clowns rights that are not expressly apart of our U.S. Constitution...you know that g-- d--- piece of paper that Bush refers to.
If not, why are we being so pathetically meek in our response to their egregious attacks on our freedoms under some guise of "War on Terror?" Is that not an act of terror to allow open borders? Help me to understand why watching football, curled up with a mountain of chips drooling with salsa, is more important than saving one's country? Doesn't it occur to "Joe Sixpack, or his fellow compadres," that if they want to enjoy their 3-4 hours of bliss they better start paying attention to what the government and the secret police are up to? He and his pals may have to work those hours in a sweat shop to pay for the chips and salsa, but not have the time nor resources to watch or afford the state controlled TV sets.
Do you comprehend what American's want from their country? I am having difficulty.
Additional Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
UnhappyAmerican
Jack M. Moutrie
But, what gives the President and the other misfits the right to destroy this country without our consent? Wouldn't you at least feel better if they asked for our permission? One gets the opinion that the people have given these clowns rights that are not expressly apart of our U.S. Constitution...you know that g-- d--- piece of paper that Bush refers to.
If not, why are we being so pathetically meek in our response to their egregious attacks on our freedoms under some guise of "War on Terror?" Is that not an act of terror to allow open borders? Help me to understand why watching football, curled up with a mountain of chips drooling with salsa, is more important than saving one's country? Doesn't it occur to "Joe Sixpack, or his fellow compadres," that if they want to enjoy their 3-4 hours of bliss they better start paying attention to what the government and the secret police are up to? He and his pals may have to work those hours in a sweat shop to pay for the chips and salsa, but not have the time nor resources to watch or afford the state controlled TV sets.
Do you comprehend what American's want from their country? I am having difficulty.
Additional Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
UnhappyAmerican
Jack M. Moutrie
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Senator Barack Obama's Illegal Alien position?
In response to the recent appearance of Sen. Barack Obama at Taco Bell Arena in Boise Idaho,
I sent a letter to Keith Roark, State Chairman of the Idaho Democratic Party requesting the following information:
I might add the letter was published in the Idaho Press-Tribune, March 23, 2008.
State Chairman: Keith Roark
It is of great interest to me that 14,000 people would fill Taco Bell Arena to encourage the promotion of a most Liberal Presidential Candidate.
Candidate Obama’s agenda promotes immediate pathway to citizenship for all illegal aliens, while, at the same time, providing legal drivers’ license for all foreign nationals.
There are some of us in Idaho who are concerned his one word mantra of “change” is nothing more than advancing socialism in the United States..
All the above actions would make more illegal and legal persons dependent on the federal government at the expense of businesses and taxpayers.
Is the Democratic Party of Idaho in full support of Sen. Obama’s positions? Does the Party condone ignoring our immigration laws? Is it no concern of the Party that rewarding individuals who have compromised the sovereignty of this nation by entering this country illegally only serves as a magnet to attract additional unlawful entry? Will America be benefited by the forthcoming additional illegal entry of uneducated, unskilled foreign nationals?
As a concerned (Independent) American, I have concerns about the agendas of all the present presidential candidates. It particularly concerns me that people can be so easily fascinated with the charisma of a candidate such as Sen. Obama and, possibly?, be ignorant of his agenda.
I feel this will be a crucial election for this nation. I think we should all make ourselves aware of the positions of the presidential candidates. Thus, I am contacting you for clarification of the Idaho Democratic Party’s positions.
I await your response,
Jack M. Moutrie
One Unhappy American
I sent a letter to Keith Roark, State Chairman of the Idaho Democratic Party requesting the following information:
I might add the letter was published in the Idaho Press-Tribune, March 23, 2008.
State Chairman: Keith Roark
It is of great interest to me that 14,000 people would fill Taco Bell Arena to encourage the promotion of a most Liberal Presidential Candidate.
Candidate Obama’s agenda promotes immediate pathway to citizenship for all illegal aliens, while, at the same time, providing legal drivers’ license for all foreign nationals.
There are some of us in Idaho who are concerned his one word mantra of “change” is nothing more than advancing socialism in the United States..
All the above actions would make more illegal and legal persons dependent on the federal government at the expense of businesses and taxpayers.
Is the Democratic Party of Idaho in full support of Sen. Obama’s positions? Does the Party condone ignoring our immigration laws? Is it no concern of the Party that rewarding individuals who have compromised the sovereignty of this nation by entering this country illegally only serves as a magnet to attract additional unlawful entry? Will America be benefited by the forthcoming additional illegal entry of uneducated, unskilled foreign nationals?
As a concerned (Independent) American, I have concerns about the agendas of all the present presidential candidates. It particularly concerns me that people can be so easily fascinated with the charisma of a candidate such as Sen. Obama and, possibly?, be ignorant of his agenda.
I feel this will be a crucial election for this nation. I think we should all make ourselves aware of the positions of the presidential candidates. Thus, I am contacting you for clarification of the Idaho Democratic Party’s positions.
I await your response,
Jack M. Moutrie
One Unhappy American
Friday, September 21, 2007
RESIGN LARRY CRAIG, PLEASE! NOW!
Whether Senator Larry Craig exonerates his tainted name is not the issue. Although many have extolled his value to Idaho because of his seniority for being able to gain federal dollars (read taxpayers money) for special programs (read special interests), the dark side is that he does not listen to the People. The majority of the People do not want more immigration, but less.
Craig's AgJobs bill is an example. When first conceived it was being sold as correcting a difficulty that farmers had in getting H-2A visas. It did not pass. Now, in its present form it grants illegal aliens the right to stay in the country, work in agriculture for three years, and then be given permanent status to remain. Then they are free to move onto other jobs. It should not pass. If Craig remains, by what stealth move will he use to get this atrocious bill passed?
The entire guest workers' concept is bogus, because it is a program that continually requires new workers each year to replace those that move onto higher paying jobs. These workers will be allowed to bring their families and produce untold numbers of new citizens of which many will end on welfare rolls. It will not reduce the price of products, but it will increase our population to unbearable levels.
Craig claims we need 500,000 immigrants yearly to achieve an economic growth of 3.5 percent annually, just so we can fund social security for the baby boomer's retirements. How will we then pay for retirements of those who came to pay for the boomers? Had Congress not continually raided the trust fund, this might not be necessary.
Economic growth is just like the "Ponzi" scheme of Social Security. You just cannot continue to add more people to gain more economic wealth without recognizing that there are limits to growth. P.A. Madison (www.federalistblog.us/
Craig, and the other pro-illegal alien lobbies, are lulling us to sleep. They still want cheap labor and amnesty for illegal aliens and are exploring every angle to push it down our throats. Craig has made it amply clear he is pro-amnesty. The only real solution is to enforce the entire law, and send every illegal alien back to their home countries. If you dare believe Senator Craig on the recent crackdown, "That's the law. It's being enforced, and it should be enforced." Tell Craig and others, to apply that accurate analysis to all of the current immigration law? We are tired of hearing the "law is broken, " when you know the President and Administration have been totally negligent in enforcing our laws. They all want open borders.....
If he reneges on his resignation tell him he needs to revisit the birthright clause of the 14th Amendment, because he and his colleagues have misinterpreted its "intent"? The Amendment excluded children of aliens from becoming automatic citizens. Therefore, those granted citizenship by this misinterpretation should be retroactively declared as aliens.
Another new gimmick to twist the American citizens mind, is illegal alien students hoping to join the armed forces, a path to permanent legal status.
While you're at it, tell him to severely reduce those who may be included in family reunification, since they, Congress are working 24/7 to totally destroy America!
A Senator's first duty is to represent and support the citizens', not illegal aliens!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho.....
Craig's AgJobs bill is an example. When first conceived it was being sold as correcting a difficulty that farmers had in getting H-2A visas. It did not pass. Now, in its present form it grants illegal aliens the right to stay in the country, work in agriculture for three years, and then be given permanent status to remain. Then they are free to move onto other jobs. It should not pass. If Craig remains, by what stealth move will he use to get this atrocious bill passed?
The entire guest workers' concept is bogus, because it is a program that continually requires new workers each year to replace those that move onto higher paying jobs. These workers will be allowed to bring their families and produce untold numbers of new citizens of which many will end on welfare rolls. It will not reduce the price of products, but it will increase our population to unbearable levels.
Craig claims we need 500,000 immigrants yearly to achieve an economic growth of 3.5 percent annually, just so we can fund social security for the baby boomer's retirements. How will we then pay for retirements of those who came to pay for the boomers? Had Congress not continually raided the trust fund, this might not be necessary.
Economic growth is just like the "Ponzi" scheme of Social Security. You just cannot continue to add more people to gain more economic wealth without recognizing that there are limits to growth. P.A. Madison (www.federalistblog.us/
Craig, and the other pro-illegal alien lobbies, are lulling us to sleep. They still want cheap labor and amnesty for illegal aliens and are exploring every angle to push it down our throats. Craig has made it amply clear he is pro-amnesty. The only real solution is to enforce the entire law, and send every illegal alien back to their home countries. If you dare believe Senator Craig on the recent crackdown, "That's the law. It's being enforced, and it should be enforced." Tell Craig and others, to apply that accurate analysis to all of the current immigration law? We are tired of hearing the "law is broken, " when you know the President and Administration have been totally negligent in enforcing our laws. They all want open borders.....
If he reneges on his resignation tell him he needs to revisit the birthright clause of the 14th Amendment, because he and his colleagues have misinterpreted its "intent"? The Amendment excluded children of aliens from becoming automatic citizens. Therefore, those granted citizenship by this misinterpretation should be retroactively declared as aliens.
Another new gimmick to twist the American citizens mind, is illegal alien students hoping to join the armed forces, a path to permanent legal status.
While you're at it, tell him to severely reduce those who may be included in family reunification, since they, Congress are working 24/7 to totally destroy America!
A Senator's first duty is to represent and support the citizens', not illegal aliens!
Unhappy Americans from Idaho.....
Sunday, June 03, 2007
TO ANYONE WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN AMERICAN CITIZENS
Is there no sanity in the Senate?
For weeks Ted Kennedy and special interests have been holed up with the President's men, conspiring to foist another amnesty on the American citizens. The current Comprehensive Immigration Reform is a scam based on lies. CIR is a fraud which does not serve the people of this nation. In fact, this amnesty will destroy unity and bankrupt this nation.
The Snake Kennedy said in 1986, "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." He might be lying whether it is amnesty, but he is right the 1986 bill is far better than the current S. 1348. Amnesty for 12 to 30 million illegal aliens will be much more devastating to the United States and her citizens than the 3 million actually granted amnesty from the 1986 bill.
If there is any similarity between S. 1348 and last years S. 2611 we can expect legal immigration to be expanded up to 3-4 million per year. We can only guess whether family reunification will be apart of the new bill. If so, be prepared to see the population expand by another 100 million in the next two decades.
There will be sections devoted to border security and employer sanctions like prior bills, but there is no guarantee that enforcement will ensue. How convenient, the Presidents, Congresses, and administrations will just ignore the law as they have for the past twenty years. If we are nation in 2027 I can envision that we will be having another amnesty for another 20 million illegal aliens.
With a government and Congressmen so willing to lie to the public can we really trust anything that they say? Already, the President is reneging on the Secure Fence Act. It has been said that only two miles out of the approved 700 miles has been built. If it takes two years to build two miles the entire fence will be built in the year 2356. The number of border patrol agents hired has been scaled back. They tell us that the number of apprehensions are down due to presence of the National Guard, or is it that the Border Patrol is afraid to make arrests for fear of being indicted for doing their job?
The government does not tell us the truth about how many illegal aliens enter the U.S. A report by the House Committee on Homeland Security reported, "Federal law enforcement estimates that 10 percent to 30 percent of illegal aliens are actually apprehended and 10 percent to 20 percent of drugs are seized. Therefore, in 2005, as many as 10 to 4 million illegal aliens crossed into the United States; and as much as 4.8 to 2.4 million pounds of cocaine and 25.5 to 12.8 million pounds of marijuana entered the United States." (converted from kg to lbs.) This is totally unacceptable. If this amnesty becomes law, and border security is ignored as expected, these numbers will climb and we will cease to be a nation.
We cannot afford to trust the President and Congress to provide security, because they have and are demonstrating they are not trustworthy. If we believe them we will surely lose once again.
We need a complete moratorium on immigration, with immediate control of the borders, and a policy to promote attrition of illegal aliens in this country. The latter can be done by enforcing current law and stiffening penalties for those that aid and abet, especially those hiring and providing welfare to illegal aliens.
UNHAPPY AMERICAN IN MERIDIAN, IDAHO
For weeks Ted Kennedy and special interests have been holed up with the President's men, conspiring to foist another amnesty on the American citizens. The current Comprehensive Immigration Reform is a scam based on lies. CIR is a fraud which does not serve the people of this nation. In fact, this amnesty will destroy unity and bankrupt this nation.
The Snake Kennedy said in 1986, "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." He might be lying whether it is amnesty, but he is right the 1986 bill is far better than the current S. 1348. Amnesty for 12 to 30 million illegal aliens will be much more devastating to the United States and her citizens than the 3 million actually granted amnesty from the 1986 bill.
If there is any similarity between S. 1348 and last years S. 2611 we can expect legal immigration to be expanded up to 3-4 million per year. We can only guess whether family reunification will be apart of the new bill. If so, be prepared to see the population expand by another 100 million in the next two decades.
There will be sections devoted to border security and employer sanctions like prior bills, but there is no guarantee that enforcement will ensue. How convenient, the Presidents, Congresses, and administrations will just ignore the law as they have for the past twenty years. If we are nation in 2027 I can envision that we will be having another amnesty for another 20 million illegal aliens.
With a government and Congressmen so willing to lie to the public can we really trust anything that they say? Already, the President is reneging on the Secure Fence Act. It has been said that only two miles out of the approved 700 miles has been built. If it takes two years to build two miles the entire fence will be built in the year 2356. The number of border patrol agents hired has been scaled back. They tell us that the number of apprehensions are down due to presence of the National Guard, or is it that the Border Patrol is afraid to make arrests for fear of being indicted for doing their job?
The government does not tell us the truth about how many illegal aliens enter the U.S. A report by the House Committee on Homeland Security reported, "Federal law enforcement estimates that 10 percent to 30 percent of illegal aliens are actually apprehended and 10 percent to 20 percent of drugs are seized. Therefore, in 2005, as many as 10 to 4 million illegal aliens crossed into the United States; and as much as 4.8 to 2.4 million pounds of cocaine and 25.5 to 12.8 million pounds of marijuana entered the United States." (converted from kg to lbs.) This is totally unacceptable. If this amnesty becomes law, and border security is ignored as expected, these numbers will climb and we will cease to be a nation.
We cannot afford to trust the President and Congress to provide security, because they have and are demonstrating they are not trustworthy. If we believe them we will surely lose once again.
We need a complete moratorium on immigration, with immediate control of the borders, and a policy to promote attrition of illegal aliens in this country. The latter can be done by enforcing current law and stiffening penalties for those that aid and abet, especially those hiring and providing welfare to illegal aliens.
UNHAPPY AMERICAN IN MERIDIAN, IDAHO
Friday, April 13, 2007
HOUSEBREAKERS
Hello Everyone:
You might be interested in what some people are thinking about the illegal alien invasion...Look out it may get ugly in the near future, especially if amnesty occurs.
WE ARE GOOD HOUSEBREAKERS!!! We mean you no harm vieja. We just want to take away from you some of what you have. You got plenty and we don’t. That makes it our right.
[This is an email forward that needed passing on in the worst way. It deserves to be posted here as well. My additional comments are in brackets.]
Forward: A lady wrote the best letter in the Editorials in ages!
It explains things better than all the baloney you hear on TV.
Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that
Congress is finally addressing the issue of Illegal Immigration. Certain people are angry that the US might protect its Own Borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.
Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave. But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors; I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hardworking and honest (except for when I broke into your house).
[Don’t ask me to speak for the rest of my people who engage in other criminal behavior besides breaking and entering. I will operate in denial if you tell me any of my countrymen and women steal your things to go buy their drugs or their Miller beer -- or even just food because they are too lazy to work -- or even rape you if they find you are defenseless.]”
According to the protesters, “not only must you let me stay, you must add me to your family's insurance plan, educate my kids, and provide other benefits to me and to my family (my husband will do your yard work because he too is hardworking and honest, except for that breaking in part).”
“If you try to call the police or force me out, I will
[call you vile names like pendeja gringa and pinche guera and] call my friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my right to be there [in defiance of your laws and your sovereignty -- for which I have the utmost contempt].
“It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better myself.”
[read: go where I don't have to work as hard as at home].
I shouldn’t have to shoulder the blame if I am a no-good slob (or some of my relatives are) who can’t keep a nice house without trashing it and the surrounding neighborhood.
I'm hardworking and honest, um, except for well, you know.
“And what a deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of selfishness, prejudice,
[of xenophobia,] and being an anti-housebreaker. Oh yeah, and I want you to learn my language so you can communicate with me.
[I shouldn’t have to pay for my own mental and physical laziness. After all, that is why I left home. To make it there you have to work hard. I’d rather come here and live off you and feed off the scraps from your table. And if enough scraps do not fall my way it is my right to take straight off the table without asking permission and you can’t stop me!]”
Why can't people see how ridiculous this is?!
[Could it be they hate this country that gives them their wealth, their prosperity, and their ease? How VERY INSANE!] Only in America....[No, other countries have made this mistake and succumbed to this lunacy as well -- and are now paying dearly for it.]
If you agree, pass it on (in English). Share it if you see the value of it as a good smile.
If not blow it off -- along with your future Social Security funds….
[that crooked and traitorous politicians are bent on further stealing from us in order to attempt to buy the allegiance of these foreign invaders.]
End of Forward
Arthur Warchol Wylie, Texas Arthur21743(at)yahoo.com
Additional Immigration Information: http://all-about-illegal-immigration.com
You might be interested in what some people are thinking about the illegal alien invasion...Look out it may get ugly in the near future, especially if amnesty occurs.
WE ARE GOOD HOUSEBREAKERS!!! We mean you no harm vieja. We just want to take away from you some of what you have. You got plenty and we don’t. That makes it our right.
[This is an email forward that needed passing on in the worst way. It deserves to be posted here as well. My additional comments are in brackets.]
Forward: A lady wrote the best letter in the Editorials in ages!
It explains things better than all the baloney you hear on TV.
Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that
Congress is finally addressing the issue of Illegal Immigration. Certain people are angry that the US might protect its Own Borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests.
Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave. But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors; I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hardworking and honest (except for when I broke into your house).
[Don’t ask me to speak for the rest of my people who engage in other criminal behavior besides breaking and entering. I will operate in denial if you tell me any of my countrymen and women steal your things to go buy their drugs or their Miller beer -- or even just food because they are too lazy to work -- or even rape you if they find you are defenseless.]”
According to the protesters, “not only must you let me stay, you must add me to your family's insurance plan, educate my kids, and provide other benefits to me and to my family (my husband will do your yard work because he too is hardworking and honest, except for that breaking in part).”
“If you try to call the police or force me out, I will
[call you vile names like pendeja gringa and pinche guera and] call my friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my right to be there [in defiance of your laws and your sovereignty -- for which I have the utmost contempt].
“It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better myself.”
[read: go where I don't have to work as hard as at home].
I shouldn’t have to shoulder the blame if I am a no-good slob (or some of my relatives are) who can’t keep a nice house without trashing it and the surrounding neighborhood.
I'm hardworking and honest, um, except for well, you know.
“And what a deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of selfishness, prejudice,
[of xenophobia,] and being an anti-housebreaker. Oh yeah, and I want you to learn my language so you can communicate with me.
[I shouldn’t have to pay for my own mental and physical laziness. After all, that is why I left home. To make it there you have to work hard. I’d rather come here and live off you and feed off the scraps from your table. And if enough scraps do not fall my way it is my right to take straight off the table without asking permission and you can’t stop me!]”
Why can't people see how ridiculous this is?!
[Could it be they hate this country that gives them their wealth, their prosperity, and their ease? How VERY INSANE!] Only in America....[No, other countries have made this mistake and succumbed to this lunacy as well -- and are now paying dearly for it.]
If you agree, pass it on (in English). Share it if you see the value of it as a good smile.
If not blow it off -- along with your future Social Security funds….
[that crooked and traitorous politicians are bent on further stealing from us in order to attempt to buy the allegiance of these foreign invaders.]
End of Forward
Arthur Warchol Wylie, Texas Arthur21743(at)yahoo.com
Additional Immigration Information: http://all-about-illegal-immigration.com
Saturday, February 17, 2007
AMERICA: By, For and of the People?
Dear Idaho Legislators:
As you know the subject of immigration is in the forefront, and if not on your agenda it should be.
Illegal aliens are an immense problem in the United States, of which I will remind you, Idaho is a part and shares equally in the responsibility of upholding our laws.
I will not go into all the issues regarding illegal aliens and their impacts on Idaho citizens, other than to focus on growth (both economic and population).
It is estimated that in the United States there is between 12 and 30 million illegal aliens.
Obviously, those who wish to minimize impacts choose the lower number, while we who tend to read statistics on border crossings, labor numbers, school enrollments, and other measures believe the true numbers are closer to the 30 million.
The population in the United States just topped 300 million, with projections of being 500 million by mid century and one billion by centuries end.
Bills before the United States Congress, if passed, will ensure this number.
In fact, the projections might be low if the President sees fit to up the number of asylum and refugee cases he allows, the number of legal immigrants is increased from one to 2-3 million, and illegal immigration continues unabated.
Top this with “family reunification” and permitting babies born to illegal aliens to become citizens, thus assuring they are all allowed to remain in the country.
As Frosty Wooldridge writing for NewsWithViews (16 Feb 07) stated, "As our numbers increase, our freedoms decrease. The more we increase, the more freedom decreases in every aspect of our lives. Where your commute used to be 15 minutes, it's now 30. Soon, it will be 45 minutes. You can think of a dozen more examples...
" Our astute Idaho Senator, Larry Craig, boldly declared that we will need 500,000 new agricultural workers each year, because they move on to better paying jobs. So, you can see that he believes we need a guest worker program to supply that labor. But, is there some fallacy of reasoning in this economic model?
As you look across the Treasure Valley you see thousands of acres of prime farmland being converted into big money for a very few, an enlarging government to accommodate a surging population (in the words of Canyon County’s Idaho Senate Delegation, “Our population growth has caused meeting rooms to become too small...”), increasing numbers of illegal aliens (up to 60,000 in Idaho, and growing?), and gridlock at every intersection (not to mention the drive from Boise to Nampa).
In light of this madness why is the State encouraging a greater population? It must be because current economic wisdom says we need evermore bodies to feed the economic monster.
This obviously results in the loss of freedoms and makes life less fruitful and more hectic for all.
Who really benefits from uncontrolled growth?
Surely, you cannot believe that we who live in the Treasure Valley are enjoying the growth in population.
Why should the general populace support ever greater population, bigger government, and the inevitable loss in quality of life just to satisfy the desires of a few to become richer?
What do you suppose it will be like when the valley is overrun by another million people and illegal alien gang members are as prevalent as those in Los Angeles?
Don’t you suppose you as legislators should think about the general welfare of your constituents rather than the welfare of those seeking ever greater profits?
Do we really need another McDonald’s or another Taco stand?
It is time to put the breaks on. It is time that Idaho develops their own stringent laws on hiring illegal aliens. Let it be known that illegal aliens are not welcome and will not receive any benefits.
Let it be known Idaho is not a “sanctuary state” and that they are subject to our laws...deportation for unlawfully entering the United States. Let them know that if they are caught a second time, it is a felony, AND THEY WILL GO STRAIGHT TO JAIL.
Tell the Federal Government that Idaho expects that they will enforce the laws they enact, will obey Federal law only if it is Constitutional, and laws will be challenged if perceived to be unconstitutional.
The State needs to tell the Federal government that the people have all rights not specifically granted to the Federal or State governments by the Constitution.
So if the Federal government will not exercise its powers under the Constitution to protect the citizens then the State should take the initiative and do so.
As a sovereign entity it is imperative or the entity will be nothing more than a puppet to the tyranny of a greedy, power hungry, federal government.
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
As you know the subject of immigration is in the forefront, and if not on your agenda it should be.
Illegal aliens are an immense problem in the United States, of which I will remind you, Idaho is a part and shares equally in the responsibility of upholding our laws.
I will not go into all the issues regarding illegal aliens and their impacts on Idaho citizens, other than to focus on growth (both economic and population).
It is estimated that in the United States there is between 12 and 30 million illegal aliens.
Obviously, those who wish to minimize impacts choose the lower number, while we who tend to read statistics on border crossings, labor numbers, school enrollments, and other measures believe the true numbers are closer to the 30 million.
The population in the United States just topped 300 million, with projections of being 500 million by mid century and one billion by centuries end.
Bills before the United States Congress, if passed, will ensure this number.
In fact, the projections might be low if the President sees fit to up the number of asylum and refugee cases he allows, the number of legal immigrants is increased from one to 2-3 million, and illegal immigration continues unabated.
Top this with “family reunification” and permitting babies born to illegal aliens to become citizens, thus assuring they are all allowed to remain in the country.
As Frosty Wooldridge writing for NewsWithViews (16 Feb 07) stated, "As our numbers increase, our freedoms decrease. The more we increase, the more freedom decreases in every aspect of our lives. Where your commute used to be 15 minutes, it's now 30. Soon, it will be 45 minutes. You can think of a dozen more examples...
" Our astute Idaho Senator, Larry Craig, boldly declared that we will need 500,000 new agricultural workers each year, because they move on to better paying jobs. So, you can see that he believes we need a guest worker program to supply that labor. But, is there some fallacy of reasoning in this economic model?
As you look across the Treasure Valley you see thousands of acres of prime farmland being converted into big money for a very few, an enlarging government to accommodate a surging population (in the words of Canyon County’s Idaho Senate Delegation, “Our population growth has caused meeting rooms to become too small...”), increasing numbers of illegal aliens (up to 60,000 in Idaho, and growing?), and gridlock at every intersection (not to mention the drive from Boise to Nampa).
In light of this madness why is the State encouraging a greater population? It must be because current economic wisdom says we need evermore bodies to feed the economic monster.
This obviously results in the loss of freedoms and makes life less fruitful and more hectic for all.
Who really benefits from uncontrolled growth?
Surely, you cannot believe that we who live in the Treasure Valley are enjoying the growth in population.
Why should the general populace support ever greater population, bigger government, and the inevitable loss in quality of life just to satisfy the desires of a few to become richer?
What do you suppose it will be like when the valley is overrun by another million people and illegal alien gang members are as prevalent as those in Los Angeles?
Don’t you suppose you as legislators should think about the general welfare of your constituents rather than the welfare of those seeking ever greater profits?
Do we really need another McDonald’s or another Taco stand?
It is time to put the breaks on. It is time that Idaho develops their own stringent laws on hiring illegal aliens. Let it be known that illegal aliens are not welcome and will not receive any benefits.
Let it be known Idaho is not a “sanctuary state” and that they are subject to our laws...deportation for unlawfully entering the United States. Let them know that if they are caught a second time, it is a felony, AND THEY WILL GO STRAIGHT TO JAIL.
Tell the Federal Government that Idaho expects that they will enforce the laws they enact, will obey Federal law only if it is Constitutional, and laws will be challenged if perceived to be unconstitutional.
The State needs to tell the Federal government that the people have all rights not specifically granted to the Federal or State governments by the Constitution.
So if the Federal government will not exercise its powers under the Constitution to protect the citizens then the State should take the initiative and do so.
As a sovereign entity it is imperative or the entity will be nothing more than a puppet to the tyranny of a greedy, power hungry, federal government.
Unhappy Americans in Idaho
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, February 03, 2007
Do you want to be an illegal alien too!
November 12, 2006
Sounds very good to me sign me up!
To:President George Bush
Dear President Bush,
As a resident of Maryland and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.
My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to Illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years.
I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.
Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.
Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year. Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as "in-state" tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.
Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.
If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become Illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your assistance.
Your Loyal Constituent,
Marge Palermo
Additional info: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Sounds very good to me sign me up!
To:President George Bush
Dear President Bush,
As a resident of Maryland and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.
My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to Illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years.
I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.
Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.
Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year. Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as "in-state" tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.
Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.
If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become Illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you for your assistance.
Your Loyal Constituent,
Marge Palermo
Additional info: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Monday, January 22, 2007
Idaho Senator Larry Craig: AgJOBS Bill S.237
Mr. Craig:
Sir, I must admit you make me sick to my stomach! Your hate for American taxpaying citizens is beyond compare.
Some say your elite donors don't want workers, they want cheap, cheap labor.
Now these illegal aliens will have citizenship, Social Security after 18-months, all the Social benefits for "anchor babies" and their dependents. The aliens love you!
First of all, under whose control will these five million so-called farm workers answer too.....
please, don't say the Homeland Security, "joke," maybe the USCIS, another joke, better yet, nobody..... ya all, come on in!
After their so-called 75 day farm requirement working construction/housing is in the tank, what middle American taxpayers job will they take?
Example: Jose, Canyon County, Idaho, (IPT-12-18-05) an illegal alien, a so-called farm worker, making $6 per hour, doing House painting, $8 per hour, very good money, can't speak English, wife and two kids, living in a small house trailer. Wonderful, living the American Dream.
What do you expect the annual production will be for "anchor babies," you know that is the idea, produce babies, the E.O.I.R. will never deport anyone with a bunch of kids.
Why not? It’s compassion.....compliments of the American taxpayers…...
I see now that U.S. Judge Paul Huck in Florida is working with Hispanic lawyers to put a plan together so parents of kids born under the null and void 14th amendment, can never be deported. You know like the 31-yr. old alien felon holed up in the 7/11 store front church in downtown Chicago, for four months, the one I told you about in my previous letter.
I hear ICE is afraid of her because she is sponsored by two U.S. Senators and a U.S. Congressman, all from Illinois.
What is so clever, is that the American taxpaying middle class does not get to say a damn thing about it. Not one word about the North American Open Border Union, just swamp this former nation with illegal aliens, with no law enforcement.
Just explain who is going to protect we Americans from the terrorist, criminals that are now roaming our streets.
DETAILS: Fourth AgJOBS Bill: S-1645/S-2823/S-359 now S-237 enough is enough!
By and large, this is the same AgJOBS amnesty that was introduced last year. The AgJOBS agricultural guest worker-amnesty bill would reward thousands of illegal aliens with amnesty. Of the 1.2 million illegal aliens currently working in agriculture, an estimated 860,000, plus their spouses and children could qualify for this amnesty, so the total could reach five million or more. Most farm labor aliens are now doing construction/landscaping work full time.....
This bill would also provide amnesty for employers who broke the law by hiring illegal aliens.
To provide just one example, increased mechanization in the raisin industry probably signals an increasing trend in agriculture. Agricultural experts have estimated that with machines replacing humans to pick the raisins, labor demand will "drop to a tenth of the 40,000 to 50,000 workers typically hired today." Some growers have already stopped hiring seasonal workers (many of whom are illegal) in lieu of machines. I believe you should have considered important facts like these before supporting measures like S. 237, the AgJOBS amnesty.
There has been no congressional debate yet this session over a proposed farm worker amnesty and these facts should certainly be considered before "legalizing" upwards of five million illegal aliens. News articles highlighting increased mechanization in agriculture have suggested that there is a declining need for agricultural workers.
For instance, the switch to mechanical harvesting in the raisin industry has illustrated that, where 50 workers were once needed to harvest raisins, now only five are needed. A similar situation has occurred in the Florida orange grower industry. Increased mechanization will ensure that unemployment figures among farm workers will only increase.
In light of this, your support of S. 237, a bill that would grant upwards of five million illegal aliens amnesty seems irresponsible. How can we consider importing additional foreign workers at a time when current workers are facing increased job competition? Instead, we should be focusing on the Attrition Through Enforcement solution to illegal immigration -- increased workplace enforcement and elimination of rewards for illegal aliens.
A very disappointed,
Unhappy Americans
Additional Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegallimmigration.blogspot.com
Sir, I must admit you make me sick to my stomach! Your hate for American taxpaying citizens is beyond compare.
Some say your elite donors don't want workers, they want cheap, cheap labor.
Now these illegal aliens will have citizenship, Social Security after 18-months, all the Social benefits for "anchor babies" and their dependents. The aliens love you!
First of all, under whose control will these five million so-called farm workers answer too.....
please, don't say the Homeland Security, "joke," maybe the USCIS, another joke, better yet, nobody..... ya all, come on in!
After their so-called 75 day farm requirement working construction/housing is in the tank, what middle American taxpayers job will they take?
Example: Jose, Canyon County, Idaho, (IPT-12-18-05) an illegal alien, a so-called farm worker, making $6 per hour, doing House painting, $8 per hour, very good money, can't speak English, wife and two kids, living in a small house trailer. Wonderful, living the American Dream.
What do you expect the annual production will be for "anchor babies," you know that is the idea, produce babies, the E.O.I.R. will never deport anyone with a bunch of kids.
Why not? It’s compassion.....compliments of the American taxpayers…...
I see now that U.S. Judge Paul Huck in Florida is working with Hispanic lawyers to put a plan together so parents of kids born under the null and void 14th amendment, can never be deported. You know like the 31-yr. old alien felon holed up in the 7/11 store front church in downtown Chicago, for four months, the one I told you about in my previous letter.
I hear ICE is afraid of her because she is sponsored by two U.S. Senators and a U.S. Congressman, all from Illinois.
What is so clever, is that the American taxpaying middle class does not get to say a damn thing about it. Not one word about the North American Open Border Union, just swamp this former nation with illegal aliens, with no law enforcement.
Just explain who is going to protect we Americans from the terrorist, criminals that are now roaming our streets.
DETAILS: Fourth AgJOBS Bill: S-1645/S-2823/S-359 now S-237 enough is enough!
By and large, this is the same AgJOBS amnesty that was introduced last year. The AgJOBS agricultural guest worker-amnesty bill would reward thousands of illegal aliens with amnesty. Of the 1.2 million illegal aliens currently working in agriculture, an estimated 860,000, plus their spouses and children could qualify for this amnesty, so the total could reach five million or more. Most farm labor aliens are now doing construction/landscaping work full time.....
This bill would also provide amnesty for employers who broke the law by hiring illegal aliens.
To provide just one example, increased mechanization in the raisin industry probably signals an increasing trend in agriculture. Agricultural experts have estimated that with machines replacing humans to pick the raisins, labor demand will "drop to a tenth of the 40,000 to 50,000 workers typically hired today." Some growers have already stopped hiring seasonal workers (many of whom are illegal) in lieu of machines. I believe you should have considered important facts like these before supporting measures like S. 237, the AgJOBS amnesty.
There has been no congressional debate yet this session over a proposed farm worker amnesty and these facts should certainly be considered before "legalizing" upwards of five million illegal aliens. News articles highlighting increased mechanization in agriculture have suggested that there is a declining need for agricultural workers.
For instance, the switch to mechanical harvesting in the raisin industry has illustrated that, where 50 workers were once needed to harvest raisins, now only five are needed. A similar situation has occurred in the Florida orange grower industry. Increased mechanization will ensure that unemployment figures among farm workers will only increase.
In light of this, your support of S. 237, a bill that would grant upwards of five million illegal aliens amnesty seems irresponsible. How can we consider importing additional foreign workers at a time when current workers are facing increased job competition? Instead, we should be focusing on the Attrition Through Enforcement solution to illegal immigration -- increased workplace enforcement and elimination of rewards for illegal aliens.
A very disappointed,
Unhappy Americans
Additional Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegallimmigration.blogspot.com
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
LETTER TO SENATOR MIKE CRAPO
January 3, 2007
Senator Mike Crapo
251 East Front Street Suite 205
Boise, ID 83702
Phone: (208) 334-1776
Fax: (208) 334-9044
Located in the Idaho Statesman, Saturday, December 30, 2006...
"Judge allows attorneys to refile deportation suit"
by Ruth Morris,
S. Florida Sun-Sentinel.
“MIAMI - A South Florida lawsuit that seeks to temporarily block deportation of immigrants with children who are U.S. citizens was allowed to go forward Friday.
Although U.S. District Judge Paul Huck dismissed the original complaint, he gave lawyers until Jan. 16, to fine-tune their case and resubmit it.”
WHO IS PAUL HUCK TO MAKE SUCH A DECISION?
How can he make such a decision from the bench?
How far do you think American taxpaying citizens can be pushed before everyone decides to fight back!
A 31-year old bitch felon, a fugitive from justice is holed up in a 7/11 store front church
in downtown Chicago for over 100 days? Why?
She should be in prison with a heavy fine, a criminal, caught with stolen papers.
U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and Homeland Security won't touch her? Why?
American taxpayers are receiving bowel movements in our face everyday and people are getting sick of it.
Like the 14th amendment, "an interpretation," is really null and void, no congress or president signed the bill, "jurisdiction thereof," a joke, Congress could stop this with a stroke of the pen. 350,000 to 500,000 aliens babies are born annually each year which cost taxpaying citizens a heavy bundle of money annually.
No matter who impregnates them, alien women come here because the Socialist Society in Washington D.C. greets them with open arms to include all social benefits.
Compliments of United States Taxpayers.
I am not disgusted anymore, just damn angry.
Unhappy American
Additional Immigration information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Senator Mike Crapo
251 East Front Street Suite 205
Boise, ID 83702
Phone: (208) 334-1776
Fax: (208) 334-9044
Located in the Idaho Statesman, Saturday, December 30, 2006...
"Judge allows attorneys to refile deportation suit"
by Ruth Morris,
S. Florida Sun-Sentinel.
“MIAMI - A South Florida lawsuit that seeks to temporarily block deportation of immigrants with children who are U.S. citizens was allowed to go forward Friday.
Although U.S. District Judge Paul Huck dismissed the original complaint, he gave lawyers until Jan. 16, to fine-tune their case and resubmit it.”
WHO IS PAUL HUCK TO MAKE SUCH A DECISION?
How can he make such a decision from the bench?
How far do you think American taxpaying citizens can be pushed before everyone decides to fight back!
A 31-year old bitch felon, a fugitive from justice is holed up in a 7/11 store front church
in downtown Chicago for over 100 days? Why?
She should be in prison with a heavy fine, a criminal, caught with stolen papers.
U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and Homeland Security won't touch her? Why?
American taxpayers are receiving bowel movements in our face everyday and people are getting sick of it.
Like the 14th amendment, "an interpretation," is really null and void, no congress or president signed the bill, "jurisdiction thereof," a joke, Congress could stop this with a stroke of the pen. 350,000 to 500,000 aliens babies are born annually each year which cost taxpaying citizens a heavy bundle of money annually.
No matter who impregnates them, alien women come here because the Socialist Society in Washington D.C. greets them with open arms to include all social benefits.
Compliments of United States Taxpayers.
I am not disgusted anymore, just damn angry.
Unhappy American
Additional Immigration information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Letter to: IDAHO HEALTH AND WELFARE
December 8, 2006 (December 30, 2006 - Still "NO" response?)
Idaho Health and Welfare
450 West State Street, 5th Floor
Boise, Idaho 83720-0036
The Idaho Statesman Letters to the Editor, recently (12-07-06) printed an opinion piece written by Jill Reese which raised questions for me regarding benefits provided to illegal aliens by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare.
Ms. Reese wrote “The Bush administration has decided to abandon it’s pledge to leave no child behind. It has selected a category of children to abandon - newborn children, citizens of the United States, born to "undocumented parents," (illegal aliens) She goes on to say…”Undocumented (illegal aliens) people are already shut out of public benefits. One small exception is emergency Medicaid.”
My questions to IDHW are:
1) What agencies of the Federal Government, State Government and Local Government (American tax payers) fund Idaho Department of Health and Welfare?
2) Does IDHW receive grant money from the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (Catholic Charities, etc,)?
3) Exactly what benefits are provided for “Anchor Babies”? (An interpretation used by the courts to provide birthright citizenship to children born on American soil to illegal aliens.)
4) What benefits are provided for illegal aliens?
5) What is the cost to American taxpaying citizens of America in Idaho for all the above benefits given to illegal aliens?
On your web-site I noticed certain questions of interest in regards to benefits with regard to non U.S. citizens. However, when I attempted to access the “Frequently Asked Questions”, no answers were provided. Would you please provide me answers to the following questions?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: I don't have a green card but members of my family do. If my family members use benefits, will that prevent me from getting a green card in the future?
Q: If I am a refugee or asylee, will receiving benefits stop me from getting a green card?
Q: If I or a family member has a green card will it be taken away if we receive benefits?
Q: Who has to provide a Social Security Number when applying for benefits?
Q: Will the Department of Health and Welfare report me to the INS for applying for benefits for myself or my family?
In an article written June 16, 2001, Mr. Joe Guzzardi, an educator in Lodi, CA, and a writer for VDARE, he noted: “
“Mexico knows where it wants to go: THE U.S.”
I quote from the article; “The biggest boost for Mexico comes from our most preposterous law, the so-called “anchor baby” rule.
Illegal aliens don’t have to do or prove anything. And they don’t have to part with a dime. What awaits them is free pre-natal care and child delivery. The number of births to illegal aliens may be as high as 350,000 annually. More than 60 percent of all babies born in Los Angeles community hospitals are born to illegals.”
It was also written, “the automatic birth citizenship is common knowledge in Mexico and a huge incentive to illegal immigration.”
As an American citizen and taxpayer I am very concerned with illegal immigration and it social/economic effects on this country.
I look forward to your response to my questions regarding benefits IDHW provides to illegal immigrants.
Thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jack M. Moutrie
Additional Immigration information:
www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Idaho Health and Welfare
450 West State Street, 5th Floor
Boise, Idaho 83720-0036
The Idaho Statesman Letters to the Editor, recently (12-07-06) printed an opinion piece written by Jill Reese which raised questions for me regarding benefits provided to illegal aliens by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare.
Ms. Reese wrote “The Bush administration has decided to abandon it’s pledge to leave no child behind. It has selected a category of children to abandon - newborn children, citizens of the United States, born to "undocumented parents," (illegal aliens) She goes on to say…”Undocumented (illegal aliens) people are already shut out of public benefits. One small exception is emergency Medicaid.”
My questions to IDHW are:
1) What agencies of the Federal Government, State Government and Local Government (American tax payers) fund Idaho Department of Health and Welfare?
2) Does IDHW receive grant money from the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (Catholic Charities, etc,)?
3) Exactly what benefits are provided for “Anchor Babies”? (An interpretation used by the courts to provide birthright citizenship to children born on American soil to illegal aliens.)
4) What benefits are provided for illegal aliens?
5) What is the cost to American taxpaying citizens of America in Idaho for all the above benefits given to illegal aliens?
On your web-site I noticed certain questions of interest in regards to benefits with regard to non U.S. citizens. However, when I attempted to access the “Frequently Asked Questions”, no answers were provided. Would you please provide me answers to the following questions?
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: I don't have a green card but members of my family do. If my family members use benefits, will that prevent me from getting a green card in the future?
Q: If I am a refugee or asylee, will receiving benefits stop me from getting a green card?
Q: If I or a family member has a green card will it be taken away if we receive benefits?
Q: Who has to provide a Social Security Number when applying for benefits?
Q: Will the Department of Health and Welfare report me to the INS for applying for benefits for myself or my family?
In an article written June 16, 2001, Mr. Joe Guzzardi, an educator in Lodi, CA, and a writer for VDARE, he noted: “
“Mexico knows where it wants to go: THE U.S.”
I quote from the article; “The biggest boost for Mexico comes from our most preposterous law, the so-called “anchor baby” rule.
Illegal aliens don’t have to do or prove anything. And they don’t have to part with a dime. What awaits them is free pre-natal care and child delivery. The number of births to illegal aliens may be as high as 350,000 annually. More than 60 percent of all babies born in Los Angeles community hospitals are born to illegals.”
It was also written, “the automatic birth citizenship is common knowledge in Mexico and a huge incentive to illegal immigration.”
As an American citizen and taxpayer I am very concerned with illegal immigration and it social/economic effects on this country.
I look forward to your response to my questions regarding benefits IDHW provides to illegal immigrants.
Thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jack M. Moutrie
Additional Immigration information:
www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, December 16, 2006
THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! NOT THE DIVERSIFIED STATES OF AMERICA!
Posted by Mwalltexan on Saturday December 16, 2006 at 3:09 pm PHXnews.com
Illegal aliens and many legal immigrants enter this country and insist upon living and behaving as if they were still in their countries of origin.
That is not acceptable!
Muslims in this country behave with total disregard for those around them... like those arrogant Imams at the airport.
They have set up their own enclaves within our borders where they insist upon living and behaving as if they were still in their countries of origin.
Our reprehensible government not only allows this to happen..... it promotes it!
Muslims sue at the drop of a hat for any perceived slight no matter how ridiculous.... an action not available in their own countries where dissent often costs the dissenter their head.
Mexicans both legal and illegal sue at the drop of a hat for any perceived slight no matter how ridiculous.... A lawsuit in Mexico by an illegal alien would not even be possible.
History reflects that diversity within a country.... destroys that country.
Unity is the glue that holds a country and its people together against all who would destroy it.
Unity promotes strength of purpose and binds a country together.
This is the UNITED States of America! ... Not the DIVERSIFIED States of America!
What legal immigrants, illegal aliens and their advocates fail to grasp is the very concept of respect.
They will not get respect by demanding it...nor should they.
Genuine and True respect is only accorded to those who earn it by their actions.
Regarding all of the lawsuits......
We need to return the favor..... Americans by the thousands need to sue the government,
Michael Chertoff and Alberto Gonzales for their failure to enforce our laws and secure our borders.
Americans by the thousands need to sue every time an illegal alien harms an American..... Every time they steal an identity.
Every American on that plane with those Imams needs to sue each of them individually!
Americans by the thousands need to sue any and every Judge, official or politician who does not place the rights of Americans above those illegally in our country.
We need to implement existing sedition laws that allow us to legally hold accountable all organizations, politicians and individuals who aid and abet the presence of illegal aliens in our country.
We can set up a fund and every group... every individual American can contribute according to their own means... even if it is only a dollar.
We can do many things if we act as one for the sake of our country and one another!
Always remember.....
United we are formidable!
Divided we are no threat at all. ... Marge
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Illegal aliens and many legal immigrants enter this country and insist upon living and behaving as if they were still in their countries of origin.
That is not acceptable!
Muslims in this country behave with total disregard for those around them... like those arrogant Imams at the airport.
They have set up their own enclaves within our borders where they insist upon living and behaving as if they were still in their countries of origin.
Our reprehensible government not only allows this to happen..... it promotes it!
Muslims sue at the drop of a hat for any perceived slight no matter how ridiculous.... an action not available in their own countries where dissent often costs the dissenter their head.
Mexicans both legal and illegal sue at the drop of a hat for any perceived slight no matter how ridiculous.... A lawsuit in Mexico by an illegal alien would not even be possible.
History reflects that diversity within a country.... destroys that country.
Unity is the glue that holds a country and its people together against all who would destroy it.
Unity promotes strength of purpose and binds a country together.
This is the UNITED States of America! ... Not the DIVERSIFIED States of America!
What legal immigrants, illegal aliens and their advocates fail to grasp is the very concept of respect.
They will not get respect by demanding it...nor should they.
Genuine and True respect is only accorded to those who earn it by their actions.
Regarding all of the lawsuits......
We need to return the favor..... Americans by the thousands need to sue the government,
Michael Chertoff and Alberto Gonzales for their failure to enforce our laws and secure our borders.
Americans by the thousands need to sue every time an illegal alien harms an American..... Every time they steal an identity.
Every American on that plane with those Imams needs to sue each of them individually!
Americans by the thousands need to sue any and every Judge, official or politician who does not place the rights of Americans above those illegally in our country.
We need to implement existing sedition laws that allow us to legally hold accountable all organizations, politicians and individuals who aid and abet the presence of illegal aliens in our country.
We can set up a fund and every group... every individual American can contribute according to their own means... even if it is only a dollar.
We can do many things if we act as one for the sake of our country and one another!
Always remember.....
United we are formidable!
Divided we are no threat at all. ... Marge
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Sunday, December 10, 2006
John McCain, a Democrat in GOP clothing.....by Bob Haran
Posted by Bob Haran on Saturday December 9, 2006 at 11:24 am MST PHXnews.com
[ Send Story to Friend ]
John McCain, a Democrat in GOP clothing Has anyone ever considered that maybe McCain is in the wrong party, that he just might be a closet Democrat or a Manchurian candidate?
Let's look at his history in the senate;
McCain/Lieberman Gun Show Bill that infringed on the Second Amendment,
McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance Law that infringed on the First Amendment,
McCain/Kennedy illegal immigrant amnesty bill, to make illegal immigrants legal immigrants on a path to citizenship, (McCain claims that this is not an amnesty)!
McCain's support of Clinton's recognition of Communist Vietnam, (thanks McCain, all us Vietnam vets love wearing shirts made by hands with the blood of our comrades still fresh on them),
McCain's involvement as the fifth member of the Keating Five with four Democrats,
McCain's support for NAFTA, However, NAFTA was pushed by Republican's and Clinton,
does that make McCain a Democrat or just another political prostitute paid for by greedy business interest?
McCain's support for CAFTA, (well that proves he's a political prostitute working against the American worker and for the greedy business interests)
McCain voted with the Democrats against the Federal Marriage Amendment to ban homosexual marriage, (maybe McCain SUCKING up to the Log Cabin Republicans in Washington but he did pander to the right in Arizona by supporting the Protect Marriage Amendment),
Now McCain is getting in bed with Chuck Schumer, who tried to have Jon Kyl replaced in the Senate by a liberal Democrat.
The hero worshiping, country club Republican kool aid drinkers should ask themselves, is John McCain a Republican or a Democrat in GOP clothing?
Bob Haran,
Independent Conservative and Vietnam veteran against McCain and amnesty.
www.Bob-Haran.info
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
[ Send Story to Friend ]
John McCain, a Democrat in GOP clothing Has anyone ever considered that maybe McCain is in the wrong party, that he just might be a closet Democrat or a Manchurian candidate?
Let's look at his history in the senate;
McCain/Lieberman Gun Show Bill that infringed on the Second Amendment,
McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance Law that infringed on the First Amendment,
McCain/Kennedy illegal immigrant amnesty bill, to make illegal immigrants legal immigrants on a path to citizenship, (McCain claims that this is not an amnesty)!
McCain's support of Clinton's recognition of Communist Vietnam, (thanks McCain, all us Vietnam vets love wearing shirts made by hands with the blood of our comrades still fresh on them),
McCain's involvement as the fifth member of the Keating Five with four Democrats,
McCain's support for NAFTA, However, NAFTA was pushed by Republican's and Clinton,
does that make McCain a Democrat or just another political prostitute paid for by greedy business interest?
McCain's support for CAFTA, (well that proves he's a political prostitute working against the American worker and for the greedy business interests)
McCain voted with the Democrats against the Federal Marriage Amendment to ban homosexual marriage, (maybe McCain SUCKING up to the Log Cabin Republicans in Washington but he did pander to the right in Arizona by supporting the Protect Marriage Amendment),
Now McCain is getting in bed with Chuck Schumer, who tried to have Jon Kyl replaced in the Senate by a liberal Democrat.
The hero worshiping, country club Republican kool aid drinkers should ask themselves, is John McCain a Republican or a Democrat in GOP clothing?
Bob Haran,
Independent Conservative and Vietnam veteran against McCain and amnesty.
www.Bob-Haran.info
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Saturday, September 23, 2006
Dear Idaho State Legislator:
In late August, we sent you a letter describing our concern for the lack of immigration law enforcement in Idaho by state and local officers. We asked for a reply to these concerns, and to date we have not heard from you. Should we imply from your lack of response that you do not believe that illegal aliens are a problem in Idaho or in the nation?
It is quite obvious the Treasure Valley political leaders show no concern of the fact the invasion of this nation by illegal aliens is a criminal offense and is punishable by law.
It is of the opinion this Government is for the Corporations, of the Corporations, by the Corporations.
December 18, 2005, The Idaho Press-Tribune published an article written by reporter, Ben Fletcher, titled, “Most unauthorized illegals not deported.” Mr. Fletcher wrote the following; I quote;
“CANYON COUNTY - As it stands, most undocumented immigrants living locally will not be deported. A combination of policies, procedures, resources and inadequate incarceration space ensure Canyon County stands as a safe haven for illegal immigrants.
Federal agents working locally don’t shy away from offering an explanation either.
“For general illegal aliens, we do not have the resources to pursue it,”
said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Senior Special Agent,
Jeff Wolstenholme. “We do not have the manpower to do our job.” End of quote.
Surely, you are aware of the debate going on in Congress how best to resolve the issues regarding immigration. The House has been championing a "seal the border first" approach, while the Senate has chosen to create a literal nightmare by granting legality to millions of illegal aliens. It is our contention that our nation does not need to grow by 100 million persons in the next 20-30 years, or to a billion by centuries end, to satisfy employers desire for cheaper labor. Such an approach will be disastrous for the environment and the quality of life we now enjoy.
We could cite a multitude of studies and comments dwelling on the effects of an exploding unskilled population on land use, loss of farmland, dwindling water supplies, a general increase in crime, and ever increasing costs to support these immigrants.
We feel that if you are not aware of this danger, then you owe it to your family, and descendants to learn the facts. You also owe it the citizens of the State to protect their interests, and not sellout to corporate interests for private gain.
We are perplexed why Idaho's legislature is not doing anything to control the increase in the illegal alien population.
We believe that the Federal Government has not prevented State and Local Law Enforcement from enforcing existing immigration laws, and that these entities only need a mandate from the State to begin enforcing federal law.
We previously asked you to comment and are very concerned that a "no response" is the norm today from elected officials.
If you expect to be paid by taxpayers you should at least be willing to provide answers to their questions. If not, then perhaps you should consider another line of work.
As State Citizens, we are extremely tired of being ignored......
Sincerely,
Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.
16436 Pride Lane
Caldwell, ID 83607
208-455-1338
rbmcjm@msn.com
Jack M. Moutrie
2686 N. Snow Goose Way
Meridian, ID 83646
208-888-6127
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
Blog Spot: http://allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
It is quite obvious the Treasure Valley political leaders show no concern of the fact the invasion of this nation by illegal aliens is a criminal offense and is punishable by law.
It is of the opinion this Government is for the Corporations, of the Corporations, by the Corporations.
December 18, 2005, The Idaho Press-Tribune published an article written by reporter, Ben Fletcher, titled, “Most unauthorized illegals not deported.” Mr. Fletcher wrote the following; I quote;
“CANYON COUNTY - As it stands, most undocumented immigrants living locally will not be deported. A combination of policies, procedures, resources and inadequate incarceration space ensure Canyon County stands as a safe haven for illegal immigrants.
Federal agents working locally don’t shy away from offering an explanation either.
“For general illegal aliens, we do not have the resources to pursue it,”
said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Senior Special Agent,
Jeff Wolstenholme. “We do not have the manpower to do our job.” End of quote.
Surely, you are aware of the debate going on in Congress how best to resolve the issues regarding immigration. The House has been championing a "seal the border first" approach, while the Senate has chosen to create a literal nightmare by granting legality to millions of illegal aliens. It is our contention that our nation does not need to grow by 100 million persons in the next 20-30 years, or to a billion by centuries end, to satisfy employers desire for cheaper labor. Such an approach will be disastrous for the environment and the quality of life we now enjoy.
We could cite a multitude of studies and comments dwelling on the effects of an exploding unskilled population on land use, loss of farmland, dwindling water supplies, a general increase in crime, and ever increasing costs to support these immigrants.
We feel that if you are not aware of this danger, then you owe it to your family, and descendants to learn the facts. You also owe it the citizens of the State to protect their interests, and not sellout to corporate interests for private gain.
We are perplexed why Idaho's legislature is not doing anything to control the increase in the illegal alien population.
We believe that the Federal Government has not prevented State and Local Law Enforcement from enforcing existing immigration laws, and that these entities only need a mandate from the State to begin enforcing federal law.
We previously asked you to comment and are very concerned that a "no response" is the norm today from elected officials.
If you expect to be paid by taxpayers you should at least be willing to provide answers to their questions. If not, then perhaps you should consider another line of work.
As State Citizens, we are extremely tired of being ignored......
Sincerely,
Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.
16436 Pride Lane
Caldwell, ID 83607
208-455-1338
rbmcjm@msn.com
Jack M. Moutrie
2686 N. Snow Goose Way
Meridian, ID 83646
208-888-6127
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
Blog Spot: http://allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Sunday, September 10, 2006
Letter to U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald
September 10, 2006
Patrick J. Fitzgerald - Special Counsel
Chicago Office:
Dirksen Federal Building, Fifth Floor
219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Dear Sir:
Elvera Arellano, the 31-year old felon, who is holed up in the store front, Aldalberto United Methodist Church in Chicago.
It is my opinion, this woman, with her “anchor baby,” should not push their luck and get out of this country as soon as possible? She should be in prison for at least 10-years for her crimes!
We are about to lose our country, with the White House, and the U.S. Senate being the most dangerous, treasonous corrupt traitors in this once great nation, led by liberal Socialist/Communist persons pushing American Taxpaying Citizens to the edge!
Here in Idaho you would think immigration was needed. Our newspapers seldom print anything that smacks of the truth about the illegal alien problem.
December 18, 2005, The Idaho Press Tribune reported, “Canyon County a safe haven for illegal immigrants.“ Illegal aliens most unlikely to be "not" deported if they stay clean?
Legislators are just beginning to wake up to the fact that there is a serious gang problem, claiming to pass a law sometime to make it illegal for a gang member to recruit.
Our Senior Senator L.E. Craig, is pro-illegal-alien with his AgJOB S.359, the man can’t see or hear taxpaying citizens, his only love is farm owners and corporations, the big money!
What can we do?
Bush claims, “we are a nation of laws, we know” that is a damn lie, who is going to enforce the law?
Example: “Elvera Arellano in Chicago, ICE is afraid of the Mexicans” they can't arrest her?
“Are American’s the most stupid people on earth?” The answer “is yes.”
Now I must conclude that not only are we stupid, but we are also masochistic. We take great pleasure in being dominated and abused by our government. The majority of American citizens want legal immigration reduced substantially, illegal entry halted completely, and the deportation of all illegal aliens. Americans want Homeland Security,
The E.O.I.R. abolished, an illegal alien is a criminal, they must be deported, not cuddled!
Replace the Border Patrol with 36,000 U.S. Army and Marines, not the Nanny Patrol (Natl. Guard) who don’t even carry water pistols. Stop the Public Relations Scam!
The Senate is proposing a massive guest-worker amnesty to be given to 20 million plus illegal aliens. This will complete our demise as a Republic. These 20 million will quickly grow to 60 million from “family reunification” with millions more from their offspring. Amnesty is a magnet for more to come. Projections predict a U.S. population of 500 million by mid-century and over 1 billion by the year 2100.
The lead now is the North American Open Borders Union, (SPP) which Bush is now pushing for 2007 as the effective date to start, so as to meet the demands of the Council of Foreign Relations date of 2010. When complete this nation is doomed and will be destroyed.
If you don’t want to lose your country, then demand that the President and Congress enforce a halt on all immigration (legal-illegal) and start deporting all illegal aliens.
Stop all this nonsense, Taxpaying citizens can’t do a damn thing about it, we have no say. The old story, “of the people, by the people, for the people,” has been replaced,
“This government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations,
Is the slogan of the liberal Socialist/Communist movement in Washington, DC.
We must stop the movement before violence and bloodshed becomes rampant and this once great nation goes up in flames. A must read, “Civil War Two: the Breakup of America, by Thomas W. Chittum, written in 1996.…. It is all there?
If we don't, then we are all stupid and are masochistic and we deserve to live in a third world country.
Unhappy American
Visit www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Patrick J. Fitzgerald - Special Counsel
Chicago Office:
Dirksen Federal Building, Fifth Floor
219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Dear Sir:
Elvera Arellano, the 31-year old felon, who is holed up in the store front, Aldalberto United Methodist Church in Chicago.
It is my opinion, this woman, with her “anchor baby,” should not push their luck and get out of this country as soon as possible? She should be in prison for at least 10-years for her crimes!
We are about to lose our country, with the White House, and the U.S. Senate being the most dangerous, treasonous corrupt traitors in this once great nation, led by liberal Socialist/Communist persons pushing American Taxpaying Citizens to the edge!
Here in Idaho you would think immigration was needed. Our newspapers seldom print anything that smacks of the truth about the illegal alien problem.
December 18, 2005, The Idaho Press Tribune reported, “Canyon County a safe haven for illegal immigrants.“ Illegal aliens most unlikely to be "not" deported if they stay clean?
Legislators are just beginning to wake up to the fact that there is a serious gang problem, claiming to pass a law sometime to make it illegal for a gang member to recruit.
Our Senior Senator L.E. Craig, is pro-illegal-alien with his AgJOB S.359, the man can’t see or hear taxpaying citizens, his only love is farm owners and corporations, the big money!
What can we do?
Bush claims, “we are a nation of laws, we know” that is a damn lie, who is going to enforce the law?
Example: “Elvera Arellano in Chicago, ICE is afraid of the Mexicans” they can't arrest her?
“Are American’s the most stupid people on earth?” The answer “is yes.”
Now I must conclude that not only are we stupid, but we are also masochistic. We take great pleasure in being dominated and abused by our government. The majority of American citizens want legal immigration reduced substantially, illegal entry halted completely, and the deportation of all illegal aliens. Americans want Homeland Security,
The E.O.I.R. abolished, an illegal alien is a criminal, they must be deported, not cuddled!
Replace the Border Patrol with 36,000 U.S. Army and Marines, not the Nanny Patrol (Natl. Guard) who don’t even carry water pistols. Stop the Public Relations Scam!
The Senate is proposing a massive guest-worker amnesty to be given to 20 million plus illegal aliens. This will complete our demise as a Republic. These 20 million will quickly grow to 60 million from “family reunification” with millions more from their offspring. Amnesty is a magnet for more to come. Projections predict a U.S. population of 500 million by mid-century and over 1 billion by the year 2100.
The lead now is the North American Open Borders Union, (SPP) which Bush is now pushing for 2007 as the effective date to start, so as to meet the demands of the Council of Foreign Relations date of 2010. When complete this nation is doomed and will be destroyed.
If you don’t want to lose your country, then demand that the President and Congress enforce a halt on all immigration (legal-illegal) and start deporting all illegal aliens.
Stop all this nonsense, Taxpaying citizens can’t do a damn thing about it, we have no say. The old story, “of the people, by the people, for the people,” has been replaced,
“This government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations,
Is the slogan of the liberal Socialist/Communist movement in Washington, DC.
We must stop the movement before violence and bloodshed becomes rampant and this once great nation goes up in flames. A must read, “Civil War Two: the Breakup of America, by Thomas W. Chittum, written in 1996.…. It is all there?
If we don't, then we are all stupid and are masochistic and we deserve to live in a third world country.
Unhappy American
Visit www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment: "jurisdiction thereof"
Washington D.C. leaders must clarify 'subject of the jurisdiction'
A recent CNN Poll (June 8-11-06) revealed that 67 percent believe our government should deport all illegal aliens, but in some fuzzy logic, 54 percent thought that children born in the United States to illegal aliens' should be citizens.
Now, it is nearly axiomatic that illegal alien parents will not be deported if they have one or more children born in the United States. The problem stems from the erroneous interpretation of 'jurisdiction' by the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (169 U.S. 649, 1898) of the citizenship clause of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution.
See www.heritage.org/Research/Legalissues/lm18.cfm
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdicition thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside..." Although some might argue that the 14th Amendment was not validly ratified, but that is another story.
However, it was clear to the author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob Howard, that everyone understood the intent and meaning when he introduced the clause. Howard testified, so even a delusional Judge could understand the intended meaning of jurisdiction, "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers..."
Thus he is just confirming what was already understood to be the national "law of the land."
In other words, it was not enough to be born within the borders of the United States or territories. A few years later Sen. James Kelly corroborated the meaning when he said, "In order to be a citizen of the United States, he must have not only been born within the United States, but born within the allegiance of the United States."
Sen. Lyman Trumbull remarked May 30, 1866, that the jurisdiction clause includes those 'not owing alleglance to anybody else... "Therefore, jurisdiction refers to political jurisdiction in the sense of allegiance and not simply subject to the laws of the United States. All visitors are subject to our laws.
Those advocating birthright citizenship based on geography need to realize this right under the 14th Amendment did not extend to Native Americans, who at the time held allegiance to the tribe rather than the United States. So why should children of illegal aliens become citizens?
Consequently, there is only one way for an alien, including children of aliens, to come under the jurisdiction of the United States, and that is through the process of our naturalization laws.
This process requires that a person renounce all allegiance to his or her country of origin, which in effect brings the alien under the jurisdiction of the United States. Therefore, only a citizen can make a citizen by childbirth; all others require naturalization.
If we are going to use the 14th Amendment as a basis for citizenship, Congress must absolutely clarify the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction" as based on the original intent and as ratified by the states before continuing debate on immigration reform.
Robert B. Murray II
rbmcjm@msn.com
Jack M. Moutrie
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
A recent CNN Poll (June 8-11-06) revealed that 67 percent believe our government should deport all illegal aliens, but in some fuzzy logic, 54 percent thought that children born in the United States to illegal aliens' should be citizens.
Now, it is nearly axiomatic that illegal alien parents will not be deported if they have one or more children born in the United States. The problem stems from the erroneous interpretation of 'jurisdiction' by the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (169 U.S. 649, 1898) of the citizenship clause of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution.
See www.heritage.org/Research/Legalissues/lm18.cfm
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdicition thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside..." Although some might argue that the 14th Amendment was not validly ratified, but that is another story.
However, it was clear to the author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob Howard, that everyone understood the intent and meaning when he introduced the clause. Howard testified, so even a delusional Judge could understand the intended meaning of jurisdiction, "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers..."
Thus he is just confirming what was already understood to be the national "law of the land."
In other words, it was not enough to be born within the borders of the United States or territories. A few years later Sen. James Kelly corroborated the meaning when he said, "In order to be a citizen of the United States, he must have not only been born within the United States, but born within the allegiance of the United States."
Sen. Lyman Trumbull remarked May 30, 1866, that the jurisdiction clause includes those 'not owing alleglance to anybody else... "Therefore, jurisdiction refers to political jurisdiction in the sense of allegiance and not simply subject to the laws of the United States. All visitors are subject to our laws.
Those advocating birthright citizenship based on geography need to realize this right under the 14th Amendment did not extend to Native Americans, who at the time held allegiance to the tribe rather than the United States. So why should children of illegal aliens become citizens?
Consequently, there is only one way for an alien, including children of aliens, to come under the jurisdiction of the United States, and that is through the process of our naturalization laws.
This process requires that a person renounce all allegiance to his or her country of origin, which in effect brings the alien under the jurisdiction of the United States. Therefore, only a citizen can make a citizen by childbirth; all others require naturalization.
If we are going to use the 14th Amendment as a basis for citizenship, Congress must absolutely clarify the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction" as based on the original intent and as ratified by the states before continuing debate on immigration reform.
Robert B. Murray II
rbmcjm@msn.com
Jack M. Moutrie
UnhappyAmerican@msn.com
Additional Immigration Information: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
www.allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
