Thursday, December 25, 2008

GOD, please bless America

Do we need a Constitution, or just some non-binding words that we can change whenever the government so decides? Isn’t the current President-elect Obama advocating just that? He has made it rather plain that he believes the Constitution is a living document and should be changed to fit today’s situations. Rather blatant, but he is not the first wanting, and actually, trashing the intent of the Constitution.

In 1913, under Woodrow Wilson we got an unconstitutional Federal Reserve System and the direct, un-apportioned tax on labor. We have had, and are having, numerous unconstitutional wars under various Presidents. George Bush, in his tenure, completely ignored his responsibility to protect the nation from invasion, invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, signed the Patriot Act, is in the midst of astronomical bailouts, is developing a North American Union and a monstrous police state. All being unconstitutional. Just as flagrant, Obama may be lying about his Constitutional eligibility and risking perjury to be President.

There are three requirements outlined in our Constitution for President (Article II, Section 1;
1) be a natural born citizen,
2) be 35 years of age,
3) have been a resident for fourteen years.
This means one must have been born in the United States to two parents that are U.S. citizens. Clearly, the framers wished to exclude persons who may have divided loyalties, through one or more parents born in foreign nations.

By posting a Certification of Live Birth on his website, Obama surely hoped that no one would notice that the document is insufficient proof of his birth location. Without a vault copy showing the name of the hospital, physicians name, and names of any witnesses we have no verification he was born in the U.S. At the time resident mothers could register their foreign born child as Hawaiian. Even if he can prove to have been born in Hawaii he is still not considered natural born.

Judge Gray quoting from Minor vs. Happersett, in Wong Kim Ark wrote, “... it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born-citizens as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” At Obama’s website Fight the Smears, he admitted “As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr., was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s son.”

Since Sandra Ann (Dunham) Obama married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen, whom adopted Barack Obama the question is whether Barack is a dual citizen.

Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham is without question an alien. He was not a natural born citizen at birth. A perfect opportunity for the destroyers would be a constitutional convention to get rid of the citizenship clause, thus ensuring that impostor Obama would remain as an illegitimate president. Sickening though it is, there are Americans who will support this treachery. (The GODS of D.C. mean to rule you with brute force, Part 2 of 2, by Devvy Kid, NewsWithViews.com, December 22, 2008)

For the consequences of this possible fraud read Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr. Ph.D., JD at www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin84.htm. For discussions of natural born and various other questions of Obama’s eligibility see http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com and http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com. For more info Google in natural born citizen and Obama.
Whether Obama is eligible or not, to protect the integrity of the Constitution demand that a fair and open jury decide based on facts not supposition.
- - - - -
Insurrection anyone?

No comments: