WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE…..
Contrary to the supposition of Ray Heidt that the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President has been proven, the question of Obama’s meeting the requirement of "natural-born citizen" is still very debatable..
1) No hospital has released a vaulted, long form Birth Certificate.
2) A Certification of Live Birth (COLB) has been posted on many websites. This is not the Same as a Birth Certificate. The COLB posted online and widely touted as Obama's "birth certificate" does not prove he was born in Hawaii, since the COLB is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true birth certificate – which includes the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.
3) There also are questions raised about Obama's move to Indonesia when he was a child and his attendance at school where only Indonesian citizens were allowed. Was he an Indonesian citizen? Did he use an Indonesian passport when he traveled to Pakistan in the ’80s? U.S. citizens were not permitted to travel to Pakistan.
4) Berg vs. Obama, 3rd U.S. Court of Appeals case No. 088-4340 is anticipated for arguments to be heard this September or October.
5) There are approximately 19 cases pending in 17 states requesting eligibility proof. More are anticipated.
Regardless of one’s political leanings, emphasis should be to uphold the intent of
Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution. This requires a United States President to be a natural-born citizen. Hundreds of thousands of reasonable (emphasis on reasonable) citizens have signed petitions requesting proof of Obama’s ability to meet this requirement.
Obama could put the issue to rest by authorizing release of his official documentation.
Unhappy American
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Friday, January 23, 2009
Opinion of an American Citizen
In my opinion our government has not changed, nor is it likely to change, in a way that will eliminate socialistic programs that will bankrupt us. Also, their collusion with corporations to grant the latter freedom to globalize at the expense of our people is likely the root cause of many of our financial problems. They as well have become partners in the government scheme to get illegal aliens firmly entrenched in our country. What better way that allowing them to purchase homes and roam freely throughout the land. My opinion expressed here is more general and expresses the view that the current administration will not cause a change for the better, especially if it continues to push for amnesty and other socialistic programs.
We the people are going to face a real calamity when the bills come due.
FDR was right, “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” Why should any of us believe otherwise? The evidence has mounted since even before his time, those in government colluding with industry, has sought more money and power. The results are undeniable that “we the people” serve no other purpose than to provide treasure for these elites so that they can continue plundering and pillaging the treasury.
The current administration will not provide relief, because the new players are mere operatives in the grand scheme. Although, the elites allowed many candidates to vie for the Presidency, along the way most were eliminated as they did not embrace the proper view. As with recent contests, the two activists who would best serve elitist interests were pitted against one another. As the tragedy unfolded, one was anointed by the media, while the other eagerly accepted his role as loser. The masses were mesmerized by the steady chants of “hope,” “Yes we can,” and “Change we can believe in.” Few understood what they were cheering for nor the consequences they would unleash.
Obviously, our real dilemma is with those who have invaded the government as agents of change, and not for the benefits of the people they supposedly serve. For decades now, our leaders’ visions were counter to our wishes. They have brought forth socialist, communistic, and fascist programs, like social security, welfare, and agricultural subsidies. They control and manipulate the economy by allowing massive influxes of legal and illegal aliens. Their educational programs have corrupted our ability to think and reason, while destroying our will to resist. They have nearly bankrupted the nation and the people through their greed. They have complete authority over our lives, and when their monetary schemes fail “we the people” are told to provide for those that caused the problem.
The corruption has become so pervasive that we have accepted it as normal. Consider, how Presidents have gradually assumed powers not delegated to them by the Constitution. We have allowed Congress to raid the treasury in order to effect the shift from a Republic to a fascist state and never question when the judiciary makes unconstitutional rulings. We have sat idly by when the Constitution or its Amendments have been abused, ignored, or purposely misinterpreted by the President, his administration, Congress, or the Judiciary. Our system of “checks and balances” has been allowed to collapse, as no one in the three branches has courage to challenge the power structure.
Sadly, the majority of the people are apathetic, ignorant, brainwashed, or are accepting of the corruption by leaders in our current system. Most people fail to understand it is their responsibility to protect the Constitution from false interpretations and outright changes through legislation or edict. If your one of the majority consider supporting a change back to a Constitutional government. This is real change I can believe in, not the socialistic programs the current administration will be offering.
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. Thomas Jefferson
Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
We the people are going to face a real calamity when the bills come due.
FDR was right, “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” Why should any of us believe otherwise? The evidence has mounted since even before his time, those in government colluding with industry, has sought more money and power. The results are undeniable that “we the people” serve no other purpose than to provide treasure for these elites so that they can continue plundering and pillaging the treasury.
The current administration will not provide relief, because the new players are mere operatives in the grand scheme. Although, the elites allowed many candidates to vie for the Presidency, along the way most were eliminated as they did not embrace the proper view. As with recent contests, the two activists who would best serve elitist interests were pitted against one another. As the tragedy unfolded, one was anointed by the media, while the other eagerly accepted his role as loser. The masses were mesmerized by the steady chants of “hope,” “Yes we can,” and “Change we can believe in.” Few understood what they were cheering for nor the consequences they would unleash.
Obviously, our real dilemma is with those who have invaded the government as agents of change, and not for the benefits of the people they supposedly serve. For decades now, our leaders’ visions were counter to our wishes. They have brought forth socialist, communistic, and fascist programs, like social security, welfare, and agricultural subsidies. They control and manipulate the economy by allowing massive influxes of legal and illegal aliens. Their educational programs have corrupted our ability to think and reason, while destroying our will to resist. They have nearly bankrupted the nation and the people through their greed. They have complete authority over our lives, and when their monetary schemes fail “we the people” are told to provide for those that caused the problem.
The corruption has become so pervasive that we have accepted it as normal. Consider, how Presidents have gradually assumed powers not delegated to them by the Constitution. We have allowed Congress to raid the treasury in order to effect the shift from a Republic to a fascist state and never question when the judiciary makes unconstitutional rulings. We have sat idly by when the Constitution or its Amendments have been abused, ignored, or purposely misinterpreted by the President, his administration, Congress, or the Judiciary. Our system of “checks and balances” has been allowed to collapse, as no one in the three branches has courage to challenge the power structure.
Sadly, the majority of the people are apathetic, ignorant, brainwashed, or are accepting of the corruption by leaders in our current system. Most people fail to understand it is their responsibility to protect the Constitution from false interpretations and outright changes through legislation or edict. If your one of the majority consider supporting a change back to a Constitutional government. This is real change I can believe in, not the socialistic programs the current administration will be offering.
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. Thomas Jefferson
Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.
Additional Blog Site: www.allaboutimmigration.blogspot.com
Monday, January 19, 2009
READER'S VIEW BY ROBERT B. MURRAY
The story of America, when finally written, will be one of a people struggling to go from rags to riches, and of the few who rose to the top and destroyed the rest. All the rhetoric about a nation of opportunity is merely fiction for most. In order to rise to the highest levels one's ambition must be greater than the love for our fellow man or country. One has to abandon all ethics, morals, and commit to a secular god of greed and power.
Mega-corporations, led by intertwined individuals, define the rules how nations will act and the amount they must pay. These individuals control the aspiring novices and only allow the most dedicated to rise from the local level. As these youngsters are impregnated with the rules, and then show their loyalties to the cause, they may advance. Importantly they must be willing to embrace the very essence of "getting-ahead", i. e. complete obedience to economic growth regardless of consequence. It is the amount that one can bring to the coffers that matters, regardless of how achieved, or whether the result is detrimental to man or his environment. The end, acquiring and amassing wealth, justifies the means.
Blindly our nation has turned over it's leadership to incompetents, or perhaps more accurately, willing partisans eager to gain both favor of their bosses and financial benefit. By these miscreants, and with help from the mighty nine Black Robes, Lincoln's words have been transformed into "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation." We the people have been cast aside and relieved of our Constitutional status.
These misanthropes find hate in Madison's words "That government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people." Now, they see the only purpose for the people, is to provide the wherewithal so that government can fulfill the needs of global corporations. Therefore, Congress writes the laws following the dictates of corporations. When satisfied the corporation will benefit, Congress meets to bestow their blessings. The Constitution is gladly abused, set-aside, or ignored by government if it does not conform to the wishes of those who stand to gain and have the power to control the outcome. How do we know, by none other than that authority Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who explains "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
Can we say that innocently, without malice, global corporations are victims of a world-wide crash of markets, lending institutions etc.? Here we are bailing out international banks, auto giants, and other world wide conglomerates, why? The answer B. Hussein Obama has given you, via Joe the Plumber, "To redistribute the wealth." What he didn't tell Joe it was to continue the Bush doctrine of taking from the poorer and giving to the richer. What easier way to institute the corporate elite plan of a new world order; destroy America by making us dependent on foreign nations.
"As Henry Kissinger recently put it, when he was celebrating U.S.-China relations on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Obama's mission is to usher in a "New World Order." He forgot to mention, of course, that it is a China-dominated New World Order in which the U.S. has become a subsidiary of China, Inc.," (www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff288.htm).
If you doubt, investigate for yourself the interconnectedness of Obama's team, Geithner, Volcker, Summers et al., and their worldly views and whom they truly represent. And you think Obama will bring change and hope?
Are you confident that our federal and state governments have your interests at heart?
- - - - - - - -
Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.
Mega-corporations, led by intertwined individuals, define the rules how nations will act and the amount they must pay. These individuals control the aspiring novices and only allow the most dedicated to rise from the local level. As these youngsters are impregnated with the rules, and then show their loyalties to the cause, they may advance. Importantly they must be willing to embrace the very essence of "getting-ahead", i. e. complete obedience to economic growth regardless of consequence. It is the amount that one can bring to the coffers that matters, regardless of how achieved, or whether the result is detrimental to man or his environment. The end, acquiring and amassing wealth, justifies the means.
Blindly our nation has turned over it's leadership to incompetents, or perhaps more accurately, willing partisans eager to gain both favor of their bosses and financial benefit. By these miscreants, and with help from the mighty nine Black Robes, Lincoln's words have been transformed into "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation." We the people have been cast aside and relieved of our Constitutional status.
These misanthropes find hate in Madison's words "That government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people." Now, they see the only purpose for the people, is to provide the wherewithal so that government can fulfill the needs of global corporations. Therefore, Congress writes the laws following the dictates of corporations. When satisfied the corporation will benefit, Congress meets to bestow their blessings. The Constitution is gladly abused, set-aside, or ignored by government if it does not conform to the wishes of those who stand to gain and have the power to control the outcome. How do we know, by none other than that authority Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who explains "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
Can we say that innocently, without malice, global corporations are victims of a world-wide crash of markets, lending institutions etc.? Here we are bailing out international banks, auto giants, and other world wide conglomerates, why? The answer B. Hussein Obama has given you, via Joe the Plumber, "To redistribute the wealth." What he didn't tell Joe it was to continue the Bush doctrine of taking from the poorer and giving to the richer. What easier way to institute the corporate elite plan of a new world order; destroy America by making us dependent on foreign nations.
"As Henry Kissinger recently put it, when he was celebrating U.S.-China relations on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Obama's mission is to usher in a "New World Order." He forgot to mention, of course, that it is a China-dominated New World Order in which the U.S. has become a subsidiary of China, Inc.," (www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff288.htm).
If you doubt, investigate for yourself the interconnectedness of Obama's team, Geithner, Volcker, Summers et al., and their worldly views and whom they truly represent. And you think Obama will bring change and hope?
Are you confident that our federal and state governments have your interests at heart?
- - - - - - - -
Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
CONFUSED: IS HE? ARE IS HE NOT?
Hello Everyone:
I am amazed how things are working in Washington D.C. Mr. Obama aka Mr. Soetoro has been sued to present evidence of his eligiblity to be President. Some cases have been visited by the Supreme Court and other are pending including one that was brought before Justice Roberts. How can he call for a private meeting with the defendant without witnesses or even having to reveal the nature of his talks? We will never know whether Justice Roberts and endorsed Obama without comment as the court has done with several cases before them. There is some skullduggery here.
Below is an excerpt from Devvy Kidds report today at www.newswithviews.com
Write your Congressmen and express your displeasure.
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS MEETS OBAMA IN PRIVATE
By: DevvyJanuary 15, 2009
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com
"Is there anything more shameful than the man who lacks the courage to be a coward?" Peter Blaunder
CBS News reported that Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, Jr., would meet in private with impostor president elect, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, on January 14, 2009:
"At the invitation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Mr. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will pay a protocol visit to the Supreme Court of the United States Wednesday afternoon, the office says....The visit is private; reporters and photographers will not be present."
I called the media number at the Supreme Court yesterday afternoon. The giddy operator confirmed they expected Obama at any minute!
To say I was floored when I read the news item is an understatement. A 'ceremonial' meeting between a president elect and justices of the Supreme Court is somewhat traditional.
HOWEVER, in this instance, it's flat out wrong. Chief Justice Roberts has cases on the docket where Obama is the defendant or is the subject of the litigation. Roberts and the other eight justices have already held two 'Distribution for Conferences' on the Donofrio and Wrotnoski cases on Obama's citizenship ineligibility. They just turned away one of Phil Berg's cases a few days ago; that one is still in the Third Circuit.
Tomorrow is the fourth case; another from Phil Berg.
On Wednesday, Roberts meets with the man at the heart of that case in private. Two days later, he sits down to discuss the case with the other justices after having a closed door meeting with the defendant!
There is still the Lightfoot v Bowen case to be heard in conference, January 23, 2009. Again, Chief Justice Roberts will sit in that private meeting to discuss whether the case should go to oral arguments.
Does anyone see major conflict of interest here? How can Chief Justice Roberts meet with Obama behind closed doors under such circumstances? Even if they just chatted up the weather, it is highly inappropriate in my humble opinion. Roberts should have notified Obama that under the circumstances, he would not be able to meet with him, private or with photogs in attendance.
There must be zero appearance of any bias or preference when it comes to judges and justices of the Supreme Court.
Thank You, Devvy Kidd.....
I am amazed how things are working in Washington D.C. Mr. Obama aka Mr. Soetoro has been sued to present evidence of his eligiblity to be President. Some cases have been visited by the Supreme Court and other are pending including one that was brought before Justice Roberts. How can he call for a private meeting with the defendant without witnesses or even having to reveal the nature of his talks? We will never know whether Justice Roberts and endorsed Obama without comment as the court has done with several cases before them. There is some skullduggery here.
Below is an excerpt from Devvy Kidds report today at www.newswithviews.com
Write your Congressmen and express your displeasure.
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS MEETS OBAMA IN PRIVATE
By: DevvyJanuary 15, 2009
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com
"Is there anything more shameful than the man who lacks the courage to be a coward?" Peter Blaunder
CBS News reported that Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, Jr., would meet in private with impostor president elect, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, on January 14, 2009:
"At the invitation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Mr. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will pay a protocol visit to the Supreme Court of the United States Wednesday afternoon, the office says....The visit is private; reporters and photographers will not be present."
I called the media number at the Supreme Court yesterday afternoon. The giddy operator confirmed they expected Obama at any minute!
To say I was floored when I read the news item is an understatement. A 'ceremonial' meeting between a president elect and justices of the Supreme Court is somewhat traditional.
HOWEVER, in this instance, it's flat out wrong. Chief Justice Roberts has cases on the docket where Obama is the defendant or is the subject of the litigation. Roberts and the other eight justices have already held two 'Distribution for Conferences' on the Donofrio and Wrotnoski cases on Obama's citizenship ineligibility. They just turned away one of Phil Berg's cases a few days ago; that one is still in the Third Circuit.
Tomorrow is the fourth case; another from Phil Berg.
On Wednesday, Roberts meets with the man at the heart of that case in private. Two days later, he sits down to discuss the case with the other justices after having a closed door meeting with the defendant!
There is still the Lightfoot v Bowen case to be heard in conference, January 23, 2009. Again, Chief Justice Roberts will sit in that private meeting to discuss whether the case should go to oral arguments.
Does anyone see major conflict of interest here? How can Chief Justice Roberts meet with Obama behind closed doors under such circumstances? Even if they just chatted up the weather, it is highly inappropriate in my humble opinion. Roberts should have notified Obama that under the circumstances, he would not be able to meet with him, private or with photogs in attendance.
There must be zero appearance of any bias or preference when it comes to judges and justices of the Supreme Court.
Thank You, Devvy Kidd.....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
