CONFUSED: IS HE? ARE IS HE NOT?

Hello Everyone:

I am amazed how things are working in Washington D.C. Mr. Obama aka Mr. Soetoro has been sued to present evidence of his eligiblity to be President. Some cases have been visited by the Supreme Court and other are pending including one that was brought before Justice Roberts. How can he call for a private meeting with the defendant without witnesses or even having to reveal the nature of his talks? We will never know whether Justice Roberts and endorsed Obama without comment as the court has done with several cases before them. There is some skullduggery here.

Below is an excerpt from Devvy Kidds report today at www.newswithviews.com

Write your Congressmen and express your displeasure.

CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS MEETS OBAMA IN PRIVATE
By: DevvyJanuary 15, 2009
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com

"Is there anything more shameful than the man who lacks the courage to be a coward?" Peter Blaunder

CBS News reported that Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, Jr., would meet in private with impostor president elect, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, on January 14, 2009:

"At the invitation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Mr. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will pay a protocol visit to the Supreme Court of the United States Wednesday afternoon, the office says....The visit is private; reporters and photographers will not be present."

I called the media number at the Supreme Court yesterday afternoon. The giddy operator confirmed they expected Obama at any minute!

To say I was floored when I read the news item is an understatement. A 'ceremonial' meeting between a president elect and justices of the Supreme Court is somewhat traditional.

HOWEVER, in this instance, it's flat out wrong. Chief Justice Roberts has cases on the docket where Obama is the defendant or is the subject of the litigation. Roberts and the other eight justices have already held two 'Distribution for Conferences' on the Donofrio and Wrotnoski cases on Obama's citizenship ineligibility. They just turned away one of Phil Berg's cases a few days ago; that one is still in the Third Circuit.

Tomorrow is the fourth case; another from Phil Berg.

On Wednesday, Roberts meets with the man at the heart of that case in private. Two days later, he sits down to discuss the case with the other justices after having a closed door meeting with the defendant!

There is still the Lightfoot v Bowen case to be heard in conference, January 23, 2009. Again, Chief Justice Roberts will sit in that private meeting to discuss whether the case should go to oral arguments.

Does anyone see major conflict of interest here? How can Chief Justice Roberts meet with Obama behind closed doors under such circumstances? Even if they just chatted up the weather, it is highly inappropriate in my humble opinion. Roberts should have notified Obama that under the circumstances, he would not be able to meet with him, private or with photogs in attendance.

There must be zero appearance of any bias or preference when it comes to judges and justices of the Supreme Court.

Thank You, Devvy Kidd.....